The Art of Writing & Speaking the English Language Part 9

In writing it is often necessary to break words at the ends of lines.

This can properly be done only between syllables, and this is the usage in the United States for the most part, though in Great Britain words are usually divided so as to show their etymological derivation.

The following rules will show the general usage in this country:

1. All common English prefixes and suffixes are kept undivided, even if the p.r.o.nunciation would seem to require division. Thus, _tion,_ and similar endings, _ble, cions,_ etc., are never divided. The termination _ed_ may be carried over to the next line even when it is not p.r.o.nounced, as in _scorn-ed,_ but this is objectionable and should be avoided when possible. When a Latin or other foreign prefix appears in English as an essential part of the root of the word, and the p.r.o.nunciation requires a different division from that which would separate the original parts, the word is divided as p.r.o.nounced, as _pref'ace_ (because we p.r.o.nounce the _e_ short), _prog'-ress,_ etc.

(The English divide thus: _pre-face, pro-gress_.)

2. Otherwise, words are divided as p.r.o.nounced, and the exact division may be found in the dictionary. When a vowel is followed by a single consonant and is short, the consonant stands with the syllable which precedes it, especially if accented. Examples: _gram-mat'-ic-al, math-e-mat'-ics_. (The people of Great Britain write these words _gram-ma-ti-cal, ma-the-ma-tic{s}l,_ etc.)

3. Combinations of consonants forming digraphs are never divided.

Examples: ng, th, ph.

4. Double consonants are divided. Examples: _Run-ning, drop-ped_ (if absolutely necessary to divide this word), _sum-mer_.

5. Two or more consonants, unless they are so united as to form digraphs or fixed groups, are usually divided according to p.r.o.nunciation. Examples: _pen-sive, sin-gle_ (here the _n_ has the _ng_ nasal sound, and the _g_ is connected with the _l_), _doc-tor, con-ster-nation, ex-am-ple, sub-stan-tive_.

6. A vowel sounded long should as a rule close the syllable, except at the end of a word. Examples: _na'-tion_ (we must also write _na'-tion-al,_ because _tion_ cannot be divided), _di-men'-sion, deter'min-ate, con-no-ta'-tion_.

Miscellaneous examples: _ex-haust'-ive, pre-par'a-tive, sen-si-bil'-i-ty, joc'-u-lar-y, pol-y-phon'-ic, op-po'-nent_.

CHAPTER IV.

p.r.o.nUNCIATION.

This chapter is designed to serve two practical objects: First, to aid in the correction and improvement of the p.r.o.nunciation of everyday English; second, to give hints that will guide a reader to a ready and substantially correct p.r.o.nunciation of strange words and names that may occasionally be met with.

Accent.

Let us first consider accent. We have already tried to indicate what it is. We will now attempt to find out what principles govern it.

Accent is very closely a.s.sociated with rhythm. It has already been stated that a reading of poetry will cultivate an ear for accent. If every syllable or articulation of language received exactly the same stress, or occupied exactly the same time in p.r.o.nunciation, speech would have an intolerable monotony, and it would be impossible to give it what is called "expression." Expression is so important a part of language that the arts of the orator, the actor, and the preacher depend directly upon it. It doubles the value of words.

The foundation of expression is rhythm, or regular succession of stress and easy gliding over syllables. In Latin it was a matter of "quant.i.ty," or long and short vowels. In English it is a mixture of "quant.i.ty" (or length and shortness of vowels) and special stress given by the speaker to bring out the meaning as well as to please the ear.

Hence English has a range and power that Latin could never have had.

In poetry, accent, quant.i.ty, and rhythm are exaggerated according to an artificial plan; but the same principles govern all speech in a greater or less degree, and even the p.r.o.nunciation of every word of two syllables or more. The fundamental element is "time" as we know it in music. In music every bar has just so much time allotted to it, but that time may be variously divided up between different notes.

Thus, suppose the bar is based on the time required for one full note.

We may have in place of one full note two half notes or four quarter notes, or a half note lengthened by half and followed by two eight notes, or two quarter notes followed by a half note, and so on.

The total time remains the same, but it may be variously divided, though not without reference to the way in which other bars in the same piece of music are divided.

We will drop music and continue our ill.u.s.tration by reference to English poetry. In trochaic metre we have an accented syllable followed by an unaccented, and in dactylic we have an accented syllable followed by two unaccented syllables, as for instance in the following:

Trochaic-- "In' his cham'ber, weak' and dy'ing, Was' the Nor'man bar'on ly'ing."

Dactylic-- "This' is the for'est prime'val.

The mur'muring pines' and the hem'locks...

Stand' like Dru'ids of eld'."

Or in the iambic we have an unaccented syllable followed by an accented, as in-- "It was' the schoo'ner Hes'perus'

That sai'led the win'try sea'."

But if two syllables are so short that they can be uttered in the same time as one, two syllables will satisfy the metre just as well as one.

Thus we have the following, in the same general met?r{e} as the foregoing quotation: "I stood' on the bridge' at mid'night, As the clocks' were stri'king the hour'."

It is all a matter of time. If we were to place a syllable that required a long time for utterance in a place where only a short time could be given to it, we should seriously break the rhythmic flow; and all the pauses indicated by punctuation marks are taken into account, in the same way that rests are counted in music. The natural pause at the end of a line of poetry often occupies the time of an entire syllable, and we have a rational explanation of what has been called without explanation "catalectic" and "acatalectic" lines.

The same principles govern the accenting of single words in a very large degree, and must be taken into account in reading prose aloud.

The general tendency of the English language is to throw the accent toward the beginning of a word, just as in French the tendency is to throw it toward the end. Words of two and three syllables are regularly accented on the first syllable; but if the second syllable is stronger than the first, it will get the accent. Thus we have _sum'mer, ar'gue, pres'ent,_ etc.; but _agree', resolve', retain',_ etc.* We have indicated above a natural reason why it cannot fail in the cases mentioned. The voice would be incapable of accenting easily the unimportant prefix in such a word as _ac-cuse',_ for instance.

Sometimes the strength of both syllables in words of two syllables is equal, and then the accent may be placed on either at will, as in the case of _re'tail,_ and _retail, pro'ceed_ and _proceed',_ etc.

There are about sixty of these words capable of being differently accented according to meaning. The verb usually takes the accent on the last syllable. In words in which it seems desirable on account of the meaning to accent the first syllable when the second syllable is naturally stronger, that second syllable is deliberately shortened in the p.r.o.nunciation, as in _moun'tain, cur'tain,_ etc., in which the last syllable has the value of _tin_.

*In the chapter at the beginning of Webster's dictionary devoted to accent it is stated that these words are accented on the last syllable because by derivation the root rather than the prefix receives the accent. This "great principle of derivation" often fails, it is admitted. We have indicated above a natural reason why it cannot fail in the cases mentioned. The voice would be incapable of accenting easily the unimportant prefix in such a word as _ac-cuse',_ for instance.

In words of three syllables, the accent is usually on the first syllable, especially if the second syllable is weak and the last syllable no weaker if not indeed stronger. Thus we have _pe'-ri-od, per'-son-ate, It'-aly,_ etc.

If for any reason the second syllable becomes stronger than either the first or the last, then the second syllable must receive the accent and the syllable before it is usually strengthened. Thus we have _i-tal'-ic,_ and there is a natural tendency to make the _i_ long, though in _Italy_ it is short. This is because _tal_ is stronger than _ic,_ though not stronger than _y_. The syllable _ic_ is very weak, but the obscure _er,_ or, _ur_ is still weaker, and so we have _rhet'-or-ic_.

In _his-tor'-ic_ the first syllable is too weak to take an accent, and we strengthen its second syllable, giving _o_ the _aw_ sound.

It will be seen that in words of two or more syllables there may be a second, and even a third accent, the voice dwelling on every other syllable. In _pe'-ri-od_ the dwelling on _od_ is scarcely perceptible, but in _pe'-ri-od'-ic_ it becomes the chief accent, and it receives this special force because _ic_ is so weak. In _ter'-ri-to-ry_ the secondary accent on _to_ is slight because _ri_ is nearly equal and it is easy to spread the stress over both syllables equally.

The principles above ill.u.s.trated have a decided limitation in the fact that the value of vowels in English is more or less variable, and the great "principle of derivation," as Webster calls it, exercises a still potent influence, though one becoming every year less binding.

The following words taken bodily from the Greek or Latin are accented on the penult rather than the antepenult (as a.n.a.logy would lead us to accent them) because in the original language the penultimate vowel was long: abdo'men, hori'zon, deco'rum, diplo'ma, muse'um, sono'rous, acu'men, bitu'men; and similarly such words as farra'go, etc.

We may never be sure just how to accent a large cla.s.s of names taken from the Latin and Greek without knowing the length of the vowel in the original,--such words, for example, as _Mede'a, Posi'don_ (more properly written _Posei'don_), _Came'nia, Iphigeni'a, Casto'lus, Cas'tores, etc_.

In a general way we may a.s.sume that the chief accent lies on either the penult or antepenult, the second syllable from the end, or the third, and we will naturally place it upon the one that appears to us most likely to be strong, while a slight secondary accent goes on every second syllable before or after. If the next to the last syllable is followed by a double consonant, we are sure it must be accented, and if the combination of consonants is such that we cannot easily accent the preceding syllable we need entertain no reasonable doubt.

By constant observation we will soon learn the usual value of vowels and syllables as we p.r.o.nounce them in ordinary speaking, and will follow the a.n.a.logy. If we have difficulty in determining the chief accent, we will naturally look to see where secondary accents may come, and thus get the key to the accent.

It will be seen that rules are of little value, in this as in other departments of the study of language. The main thing is to form the _habit of observing_ words as we read and p.r.o.nounce them, and thus develop a habit and a sense that will guide us. The important thing to start with is that we should know the general principle on which accent is based.

Special Rules for Accent.

Words having the following terminations are usually accented on the antepenult, or third syllable from the end: _cracy, ferous, fluent, flous, honal, gony, grapher, graphy, loger, logist, logy, loquy, machy, mathy, meter, metry, nomy, nomy, parous, pathy, phony, scopy, strophe, tomy, trophy, vomous, vorous_.

Words of more than two syllables ending in _cate, date, gate, fy, tude,_ and _ty_ preceded by a vowel usually accent the antepenult, as _dep'recate,_ etc.

All words ending in a syllable beginning with an _sh_ or _zh_ sound, or _y_ consonant sound, except those words ending in _ch_ sounded like _sh_ as _capu-chin',_ accent the penult or next to the last syllable, as _dona'tion, condi'tion,_ etc.

Words ending in _ic_ usually accent the penult, _scientif'ic, histor'ic,_ etc. The chief exceptions are _Ar'abic, arith'metic, ar'senic, cath'olic, chol'eric, her'etic, lu'natic, pleth'oric, pol'itic, rhet'oric, tur'meric.

Climacteric_ is accented by some speakers on one syllable and by some on the other; so are _splenetic_ and _schismatic_.

Most words ending in _eal_ accent the antepenult, but _ide'al_ and _hymene'al_ are exceptions. Words in _ean_ and _eum_ are divided, some one way and some the other.

Words of two syllable ending in _ose_ usually accent the last syllable, as _verbose',_ but words of three or more syllables with this ending accent the antepenult, with a secondary accent on the last syllable, as _com'-a-tose_.

When it is desired to distinguish words differing but by a syllable, the syllable in which the difference lies is given a special accent, as in _bi'en'nial_ and _tri'en'nial, em'inent_ and _im'minent, op'pose'_ and _sup'pose',_ etc.