Home

The Primacy of Grammar Part 26

The Primacy of Grammar - novelonlinefull.com

You’re read light novel The Primacy of Grammar Part 26 online at NovelOnlineFull.com. Please use the follow button to get notification about the latest chapter next time when you visit NovelOnlineFull.com. Use F11 button to read novel in full-screen(PC only). Drop by anytime you want to read free – fast – latest novel. It’s great if you could leave a comment, share your opinion about the new chapters, new novel with others on the internet. We’ll do our best to bring you the finest, latest novel everyday. Enjoy

Chomsky, N. 2000b. Derivation by phase. MIT Occasional Papers in Linguistics, 18. http://web.mit.edu/mitwpl.

Chomsky, N. 2000c. Minimalist inquiries: The framework. In R. Martin, D.

Michaels, and J. Uriagereka, eds., Step by Step: Essays in Honor of Howard Lasnik, 89155. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Chomsky, N. 2000d. New Horizons in the Study of Language and Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Chomsky, N. 2001a. Beyond explanatory adequacy. MIT Occasional Papers in Linguistics, 20. http://web.mit.edu/mitwpl.



Chomsky, N. 2001b. Language and the rest of the world. Bose Memorial Lecture in Philosophy, Delhi University, November 4.

Chomsky, N. 2002. On Nature and Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Chomsky, N. 2003. Replies. In L. Antony and N. Hornstein, eds., Chomsky and His Critics. London: Blackwell.

Chomsky, N. 2005. Three factors in language design. Linguistic Inquiry 36(1): 122.

Chomsky, N. 2006a. Approaching UG from below. Ms., MIT.

Chomsky, N. 2006b. Introduction. Language and Mind. 3rd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Chomsky, N. 2006c. On phases. Ms., MIT. Printed in R. Freidin, C. Otero, and M. Zubizarreta, eds., Foundational Issues in Linguistic Theory: Essays in Honor of Jean-Roger Vergnaud, 133166. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Page references are to the printed paper.

Chomsky, N. 2006d. San Sebastian lecture. Ms.

Chomsky, N. 2007. Biolinguistic Explorations: Design, Development, Evolution.

International Journal of Philosophical Studies, 15(1): 121.

Chomsky, N., and M. Halle. 1968. The Sound Pattern of English. New York: Harper and Row.

Chomsky, N., R. Huybregts, and H. Riemsdijk. 1982. The Generative Enterprise.

Dordrecht: Foris.

Chomsky, N., and H. Lasnik. 1977. Filters and controls. Linguistic Inquiry 8(3): 425504.

Chomsky, N., and H. Lasnik. 1993. The theory of principles and parameters. In J. Jacobs, A. von Stechow, W. Sternefeld, and T. Vennemann, eds., Syntax: An International Handbook of Contemporary Research. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.

Reprinted in Chomsky, The Minimalist Program, 13127. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1995.

Churchland, Patricia, and R. Grush. 1999. Computation and the brain. In R.

Wilson and F. Keil, eds., MIT Encyclopedia of the Cognitive Sciences, 155158.

Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

References 257.

Churchland, Patricia, and T. Sejnowski. 1992. The Computational Brain. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Collins, J. 2004. Faculty disputes. Mind and Language 19(5): 503533.

Coward, H. 1980. Sphota Theory of Language. Delhi: Motilal Banarasidas.

Coward, H., and K. Kunjunni Raja, eds. 2001. The Philosophy of the Grammarians: Encyclopedia of Indian Philosophers. Vol. 5. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidas.

Crain, S., and P. Pietroski. 2001. Nature, nurture and universal grammar. Linguistics and Philosophy 24: 139186.

Crain, S., and P. Pietroski. 2002. Why language acquisition is a snap. Linguistic Review 19: 163183.

Darwin, C. 1871. The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to s.e.x. London: Murray.

Dasgupta, P., A. Ford, and R. Singh. 2000. After Etymology: Towards a Substan-tivist Linguistics. Munich: Lincom Europa.

David-Gray, Z., J. Janssen, W. DeGrip, E. Nevo, and R. Foster. 1998. Light detection in a ''blind'' mammal. Nature Neuroscience 1(8): 655656.

Davidson, D. 1967. Truth and meaning. Synthese 17: 304323.

Davies, S. 1994. Musical Meaning and Expression. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

Dennett, D. 1991. Mother nature versus the walking encyclopedia: A western drama. In W. Ramsey, S. Stich, and D. Rumelhart, eds., Philosophy and Connec-tionist Theory, 2130. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Diesing, M. 1992. Indefinites. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Donnellan, K. 1966. Reference and definite descriptions. Philosophical Review 75: 281304.

Dowty, D., R. Wall, and S. Peters, eds. 1981. Introduction to Montague Semantics. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.

Duarte, I. 1991. X-bar theory: Its role in GB theory. In M. Filgueras, ed., Natural Language Processing: Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, No. 476, 2554. Berlin: Springer Verlag.

Ebbs, G. 1997. Rule-Following and Realism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Edelman, G. 1992. Bright Air, Brilliant Fire: On the Matter of the Mind. New York: Basic Books.

Embick, D., and A. Marantz. 2006. Architecture and blocking. Ms.

Evans, G. 1982. Varieties of Reference. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Everett, D. 2005. Cultural constraints on grammar and cognition in Piraha. Current Anthropology 46: 621646.

Fisher, C., D. Hall, S. Rakowitz, and L. Gleitman. 1994. When it is better to receive than to give: Syntactic and conceptual constraints on vocabulary growth. In 258 References L. Gleitman and B. Landau, eds., The Acquisition of the Lexicon, 333375. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Fisher, C., B. Church, and K. Chambers. 2004. Learning to identify spoken words. In D. Georey Hall and S. Waxman, eds., Weaving a Lexicon, 340.

Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Fitch, W. 2006. The biology and evolution of music: A comparative perspective.

Cognition 100: 173215.

Fitch, W., and M. Hauser. 2004. Computational constraints on syntactic processing in a nonhuman primate. Science 303: 377380.

Fitch, W., M. Hauser, and N. Chomsky. 2005. The evolution of the language faculty: Clarifications and implications. Cognition 97(2): 179210.

Flake, G. 1998. The Computational Beauty of Nature: Computer Explorations of Fractals, Chaos, Complex Systems, and Adaptation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Fodor, J. 1989. Why should the mind be modular?. In A. Gerge, ed., Reflections on Chomsky, 122. Oxford: Blackwell.

Fodor, J. 1994. The Elm and the Expert. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Fodor, J. 1998. Concepts: Where Cognitive Science Went Wrong. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Fodor, J. 2000. The Mind Doesn't Work That Way: Scope and Limits of Computational Psychology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Fodor, J. 2007. Semantics: An interview with Jerry Fodor. Revista Virtual de Estudos da Linguagem 5(8). www.revel.inf.br.

Fodor, J., M. Garrett, E. Walker, and C. Parkes. 1980. Against definitions. Cognition 8: 263367.

Fodor, J., and E. Lepore. 1994. Why meaning (probably) isn't conceptual role.

In S. Stich and T. Warfield, eds., Mental Representation, 142156. London: Blackwell.

Fodor, J., and E. Lepore. 2002. The Compositionality Papers. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Fox, D. 2003. On logical form. In R. Hendrick, ed., Minimalist Syntax, 82123.

London: Blackwell.

Frege, G. 1892. On sense and reference. In P. Geach and M. Black, eds., Translations from the Philosophical Writings of Gottlob Frege, 5678. Oxford: Blackwell, 1966.

Freidin, R., C. Otero, and M. Zubizarreta, eds. 2008. Foundational Issues in Linguistic Theory: Essays in Honor of Jean-Roger Vergnaud. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Fromkin, V. 1991. Language and brain: Redefining the goals and methodology of linguistics. In A. Kasher, ed., The Chomskyan Turn, 78103. Cambridge: Blackwell.

Gallistel, C. 1998. Symbolic processes in the brain: The case of insect navigation.

In D. Scarborough and S. Sternberg, eds., An Invitation to Cognitive Science: References 259.

Methods, Models, and Conceptual Issues, vol. 4, 151. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Ganeri, J. 1999. Semantic Powers. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Gardenfors, P. 1996. Conceptual s.p.a.ces as a basis for cognitive semantics. In A.

Clarke, ed., Philosophy and Cognitive Science, 159180. The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Gardner, H. 1975. The Shattered Mind. New York: Knopf.

Gentner, T., K. Fenn, D. Margoliash, and H. Nusbaum. 2006. Recursive syntactic pattern learning by songbirds. Nature 440: 12041207.

George, A. 1986. Whence and whither the debate between Quine and Chomsky.

Journal of Philosophy, September, 489500.

Gleitman, L., and E. Newport. 1995. The invention of language by children: Environmental and biological influences on the acquisition of language. In D.

Osherson, ed., An Invitation to Cognitive Science, vol. 1 (ed. L. Gleitman and M.

Liberman), 124. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Goethe, J. 1790. Versuch die Metamorphose der Pflanzen zu erklaren. English trans. in D. Miller, ed., J. W. Goethe: Scientific Studies, 53128 for his biological works, 7697 for Metamorphosis. New York: Suhrkamp, 1988.

Goldfarb, W. 1985. Kripke on Wittgenstein and rules. Journal of Philosophy 82(9): 471488.

Goldin-Meadow, S. 2004. Lexical development without a language model: Are nouns, verbs, and adjectives essential to the lexicon? In D. Georey Hall and S.

Waxman, eds., Weaving a Lexicon, 225256. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Goldin-Meadow, S., and H. Feldman. 1977. The development of language-like communication without a language model. Science 197: 401403.

Grice, P. 1975. Logic and conversation. In P. Grice, Studies in the Way of Words, 2240. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1989.

Grodzinsky, Y. 2000. The neurology of syntax: Language use without Broca's area. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23: 171.

Gruber, J. 1965. Studies in lexical relations. In J. Gruber, Lexical Structures in Syntax and Semantics, 1120. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1976.

Halle, M. 1995. Feature geometry and feature spreading. Linguistic Inquiry 26: 146.

Harley, H., and R. Noyer. 1999. State-of-the-article: Distributed morphology.

GLOT International 4(4): 39.

Hattiangadi, A. 2007. Oughts and Thoughts: Rule-Following and the Normativity of Content. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Hauser, M. 2008. The illusion of biological variation: A minimalist approach to the mind. In M. Piattelli-Palmarini, J. Uriagereka, and P. Salaburu, eds., Of Minds and Language: The Basque Country Encounter with Noam Chomsky. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

260.

References Hauser, M., N. Chomsky, and W. Fitch. 2002. The faculty of language: What is it, who has it, and how did it evolve? Science 298: 15691579.

Hauser, M., and J. McDormott. 2003. The evolution of the music faculty: A comparative perspective. Nature Neuroscience 6(7): 663668.

Hawking, S., and W. Israel, eds. 1987. Three Hundred Years of Gravitation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Hawkins, J. 1978. Definiteness and Indefiniteness. Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities Press.

Heim, I. 1982. The Semantics of Definite and Indefinite Noun Phrases. Doctoral dissertation, University of Ma.s.sachusetts, Amherst.

Please click Like and leave more comments to support and keep us alive.

RECENTLY UPDATED MANGA

Martial Peak

Martial Peak

Martial Peak Chapter 5799: Plan Author(s) : Momo,莫默 View : 15,178,007
Crazy Leveling System

Crazy Leveling System

Crazy Leveling System Chapter 1013 Author(s) : Crazy Meng Meng, 疯狂的萌萌 View : 3,020,453

The Primacy of Grammar Part 26 summary

You're reading The Primacy of Grammar. This manga has been translated by Updating. Author(s): Nirmalangshu Mukherji. Already has 511 views.

It's great if you read and follow any novel on our website. We promise you that we'll bring you the latest, hottest novel everyday and FREE.

NovelOnlineFull.com is a most smartest website for reading manga online, it can automatic resize images to fit your pc screen, even on your mobile. Experience now by using your smartphone and access to NovelOnlineFull.com