Modern Machine-Shop Practice Part 11

The method of using the table is as follows:--Suppose it is required to make a set of wheels, the smallest of which is to contain 50 teeth and the largest 150, and it is determined to use but one cutter, then that cutter should be made correct for a wheel containing 76; because in the table 76 is midway between 50 and 150.

But suppose it were determined to employ two cutters, then one of them should be made correct for a wheel having 60 teeth, and used on all the wheels having between 50 and 76 teeth, while the other should be made correct for a wheel containing 100 teeth, and used on all wheels containing between 76 and 150 teeth.

In the following table, also arranged by Professor Willis, the most desirable selection of cutters for different circ.u.mstances is given, it being supposed that the set of wheels contains from 12 teeth to a rack.

+-----------+------------------------------------------------------+ |Number of | | |cutters in | Number of Teeth in Wheel for which the Cutter is to | |the set. | be made correct. | +-----------+----+----+--------------------------------------------+ | 2 | 50 | 16 | | | --+----+----+----+ | | 3 | 75 | 25 | 15 | | | --+----+----+----+----+ | | 4 | 100| 34 | 20 | 14 | | | --+----+----+----+----+----+----+ | | 6 | 150| 50 | 30 | 21 | 16 | 13 | | | --+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ | | 8 | 200| 67 | 40 | 29 | 22 | 18 | 15 | 13 | | | --+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ | | 10 | 200| 77 | 50 | 35 | 27 | 22 | 19 | 16 | 14 | 13 | | | --+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ | | 300| 100| 60 | 43 | 34 |27 | 23 | 20 | 17 | 15 | 14 | | 12 +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ | | 13 | | | --+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ | | 300| 150| 100| 70 | 50 | 40 | 30 | 26 | 24 | 22 | 20 | | 18 +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ | | 18 | 16 | 15 | 14 | 13 | 12 | | | --+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ | |Rack| 300| 150| 100| 76 | 60 | 50 | 43 | 38 | 34 | 30 | | +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ | 24 | 27 | 25 | 23 | 21 | 20 | 19 | 18 | 17 | 16 | 15 | 14 | | +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ | | 13 | 12 | | +-----------+----+----+--------------------------------------------+

Suppose now we take the cutters, of a given pitch, necessary to cut all the wheels from 12 teeth to a rack, then the thickness of the teeth at the pitch line will for the purposes of designation be the thickness of the teeth of all the wheels, which thickness may be a certain proportion of the pitch.

But in involute teeth while the depth of tooth on the cutter may be taken as the standard for all the wheels in the range, and the actual depth for the wheel for which the cutter is correct, yet the depth of the teeth in the other wheels in the range may be varied sufficiently on each wheel to make the thickness of the teeth equal the width of the s.p.a.ces (notwithstanding the variation between the arc and chord pitches), so that by a variation in the tooth depth the error induced by that variation may be corrected. The following table gives the proportions in the Brown and Sharpe system.

+------------+-----------------+-----------------+ | Arc Pitch. | Depth of Tooth. | Depth in terms | | | |of the arc pitch.| +------------+-----------------+-----------------+ | inches. | inches. | inches. | | 1.570 | 1.078 | .686 | | 1.394 | .958 | .687 | | 1.256 | .863 | .686 | | 1.140 | .784 | .697 | | 1.046 | .719 | .687 | | .896 | .616 | .686 | | .786 | .539 | .685 | | .628 | .431 | .686 | | .524 | .359 | .685 | | .448 | .307 | .685 | | .392 | .270 | .686 | | .350 | .240 | .686 | | .314 | .216 | .687 | +------------+-----------------+-----------------+

To avoid the trouble of measuring, and to a.s.sist in obtaining accuracy of depth, a gauge is employed to mark on the wheel face a line denoting the depth to which the cutter should be entered.

Suppose now that it be required to make a set of cutters for a certain range of wheels, and it be determined that the cutters be so constructed that the greatest permissible amount of error in any wheel of the set be 1/100 inch. Then the curves for the smallest wheel, and those for the largest in the set, and the amount of difference between them ascertained, and a.s.suming this difference to amount to 1/16 inch, which is about 6/100, then it is evident that 6 cutters must be employed for the set.

It has been shown that on bevel-wheels the tooth curves vary at every point in the tooth breadth; hence it is obvious that the cutter being of a fixed curve will make the tooth to that curve. Again, the thickness of the teeth and breadth of the s.p.a.ces vary at every point in the breadth, while with a cutter of fixed thickness the s.p.a.ce cut will be parallel from end to end. To overcome these difficulties it is usual to give to the cutter a curve corresponding to the curve required at the middle of the wheel face and a thickness equal to the required width of s.p.a.ce at its smallest end, which is at the smallest face diameter.

The cutter thus formed produces, when pa.s.sed through the wheel once, and to the required depth, a tooth of one curve from end to end, having its thickness and width of s.p.a.ce correct at the smaller face diameter only, the teeth being too thick and the s.p.a.ces too narrow as the outer diameter of the wheel is approached. But the position and line of traverse of the cutter may be altered so as to take a second cut, widening the s.p.a.ce and reducing the tooth thickness at the outer diameter.

By moving the cutter's position two or three times the points of contact between the teeth may be made to occur at two or three points across the breadth of the teeth and their points of contact; the wear will soon spread out so that the teeth bear all the way across.

Another plan is to employ two or three cutters, one having the correct curve for the inner diameter, and of the correct thickness for that diameter, another having the correct curve for the pitch circle, and another having the correct curve at the largest diameter of the teeth.

The thickness of the first and second cutters must not exceed the required width of s.p.a.ce at the small end, while that for the third may be the same as the others, or equal to the thickness of the smallest s.p.a.ce breadth that it will encounter in its traverse along the teeth.

The second cutter must be so set that it will leave the inner end of the teeth intact, but cut the s.p.a.ce to the required width in the middle of the wheel face. The third cutter must be so set as to leave the middle of the tooth breadth intact, and cut the teeth to the required thickness at the outer or largest diameter.

CUTTING WORM-WHEELS.

The most correct method of cutting the teeth of a worm-wheel is by means of a worm-cutter, which is a worm of the pitch and form of tooth that the working worm is intended to be, but of hardened steel, and having grooves cut lengthways of the worm so as to provide cutting edges similar to those on the cutter shown in Fig. 107.

The wheel is mounted on an arbor or mandril free to rotate on its axis and at a right angle to the cutter worm, which is rotated and brought to bear upon the perimeter of the worm-wheel in the same manner as the working worm-wheel when in action. The worm-cutter will thus cut out the s.p.a.ces in the wheel, and must therefore be of a thickness equal to those s.p.a.ces. The cutter worm acting as a screw causes the worm-wheel to rotate upon its axis, and therefore to feed to the cutter.

In wheels of fine pitch and small diameter this mode of procedure is a simple matter, especially if the form of tooth be such that it is thicker, as the root of the tooth is approached from the pitch line, because in that case the cutter worm may be entered a part of the depth in the worm-wheel and a cut be taken around the wheel. The cutter may then be moved farther into the wheel and a second cut taken around the wheel, so that by continuing the process until the pitch line of the cutter worm coincides with that of the worm-cutter, the worm-wheel may be cut with a number of light cuts, instead of at one heavy cut.

But in the case of large wheels the strain due to such a long line of cutting edge as is possessed by the cutter worm-teeth springs or bends the worm-wheel, and on account of the circular form of the breadth of the teeth this bending or spring causes that part of the tooth arc above the centre of the wheel thickness to lock against the cutter.

To prevent this, several means may be employed. Thus the grooves forming the cutting edges of the worm-cutter may wind spirally along instead of being parallel to the axis of the cutter.

The distance apart of these grooves may be greater than the breadth of tooth a width of worm-wheel face, in which case the cutting edge of one tooth only will meet the work at one time. In addition to this two stationary supports may be placed beneath the worm-wheel (one on each side of the cutter). But on coa.r.s.e pitches with their corresponding depth of tooth, the difficulty presents itself, that the arbor driving the worm-cutter will spring, causing the cutter to lift and lock as before; hence it is necessary to operate on part of the s.p.a.ce at a time, and shape it out to so nearly the correct form that the finishing cut may be a very light one indeed, in which case the worm-cutter will answer for the final cut.

The removal of the surplus metal preparatory to the introduction of the worm-cutter to finish, may be made with a cutter-worm that will cut out a narrow groove being of the thickness equal to the bottom of the tooth s.p.a.ce and cutting on its circ.u.mference only. This cutter may be fed into the wheel to the permissible depth of cut, and after the cut is taken all around the wheel, it may be entered deeper and a second cut taken, and so on until it has entered the wheel to the necessary depth of tooth. A second cutter-worm may then be used, it being so shaped as to cut the face curve only of the teeth. A third may cut the flank curve only, and finally a worm-cutter of correct form may take a finishing cut over both the faces and the flanks. In this manner teeth of any pitch and depth may be cut. Another method is to use a revolving cutter such as shown in Fig. 107, and to set it at the required angle to the wheel, and then take a succession of cuts around the wheel, the first cut forming a certain part of the tooth depth, the second increasing this depth, and so on until the final cut forms the tooth to the requisite depth. In this case the cutter operates on each s.p.a.ce separately, or on one s.p.a.ce only at a time, and the angle at which to set the cutter may be obtained as follows in Fig. 114. Let the length of the line A A equal the diameter of the worm at the pitch circle, and B B (a line at a right angle to A A) represent the axial line of the worm. Let the distance C equal the pitch of the teeth, and the angle of the line D with A A or B B according to circ.u.mstances, will be that to which the cutter must be set with reference to the tooth.

[Ill.u.s.tration: Fig. 114.]

If then a piece of sheet metal be cut to the lines A, D, and the cutter so set that with the edge D of the piece held against the side face of the cutter (which must be flat or straight across), the edge A will stand truly vertical, and the cutter will be at the correct angle supposing the wheel to be horizontal.

[Ill.u.s.tration: Fig. 115.]

[Ill.u.s.tration: Fig. 116.]

In making patterns wherefrom gear-wheels may be cast in a mould, the true curves are frequently represented by arcs of circles struck from the requisite centres and of the most desirable radius with compa.s.ses, and this will be treated after explaining the pattern maker's method of obtaining true curves by rolling segments by hand. If, then, the wheels are of small diameter, as say, less than 12 inches in diameter, and precision is required, it is best to turn in the lathe wooden disks representing in their diameters the base and generating circles. But otherwise, wooden segments to answer the same purpose may be made as from a piece of soft wood, such as pine or cedar, about three-eighths inch thick, make two pieces A and B, in Fig. 115, and trim the edges C and D to the circle of the pitch line of the required wheel. If the diameter of the pitch circle is marked on a drawing, the pieces may be laid on the drawing and sighted for curvature by the eye. In the absence of a drawing, strike a portion of the pitch circle with a pair of sharp-pointed compa.s.ses on a piece of zinc, which will show a very fine line quite clear. After the pieces are filed to the circle, try them together by laying them flat on a piece of board, bringing the curves in contact and sweeping A against B, and the places of contact will plainly show, and may be filed until continuous contact along the curves is obtained. Take another similar piece of wood and form it as shown in Fig. 116, the edge E representing a portion of the rolling circle. In preparing these segments it is an excellent plan to file the convex edges, as shown in Fig. 117, in which P is a piece of iron or wood having its surface S trued; F is a file held firmly to S, while its surface stands vertical, and T is the template laid flat on S, while swept against the file. This insures that the edge shall be square across or at least at the same angle all around, which is all that is absolutely necessary. It is better, however, that the edges be square.

So likewise in fitting A and B (Fig. 115) together, they should be laid flat on a piece of board. This will insure that they will have contact clear across the edge, which will give more grip and make slip less likely when using the segments. Now take a piece of stiff drawing paper or of sheet zinc, lay segment A upon it, and mark a line coincident with the curved edge. Place the segment representing the generating circle flat on the paper or zinc, hold its edge against segment A, and roll it around a sufficient distance to give as much of the curve as may be required; the operation being ill.u.s.trated in Fig. 118, in which A is the segment representing the pitch or base circle, E is the segment representing the generating circle, P is the paper, C the curve struck by the tracing point or pencil O.

[Ill.u.s.tration: Fig. 117.]

[Ill.u.s.tration: Fig. 118.]

This tracing point should be, if paper be used to trace on, a piece of the _hardest_ pencil obtainable, and should be filed so that its edge, if flat, shall stand as near as may be in the line of motion when rolled, thus marking a fine line. If sheet zinc be used instead of paper a needle makes an excellent tracing point. Several of the curves, C, should be struck, moving the position of the generating segment a little each time.

[Ill.u.s.tration: Fig. 119.]

On removing the segments from the paper, there will appear the lines shown in Fig. 119; A representing the pitch circle, and O O O the curves struck by the tracing point.

Cut out a piece of sheet zinc so that its edge will coincide with the curve A and the epicycloid O, trying it with all four of the epicycloids to see that no slip has occurred when marking them; shape a template as shown in Fig. 120. Cutting the notches at _a_ _b_, acts to let the file clear well when filing the template, and to allow the scriber to go clear into the corner. Now take the segment A in Fig. 118, and use it as a guide to carry the pitch circle across the template as at P, in Fig.

120. A zinc template for the flank curve is made after the same manner, using the rolling segment in conjunction with the segment B in Fig. 115.

[Ill.u.s.tration: Fig. 120.]

But the form of template for the flank should be such as shown in Fig.

121, the curve P representing, and being of the same radius as the pitch circle, and the curve F being that of the hypocycloid. Both these templates are set to the pitch circles and to coincide with the marks made on the wheel teeth to denote the thickness, and with a hardened steel point a line is traced on the tooth showing the correct curve for the same.

[Ill.u.s.tration: Fig. 121.]

An experienced hand will find no difficulty in producing true templates by this method, but to avoid all possibility of the segments slipping on coa.r.s.e pitches, and with large segments, the segments may be connected, as shown in Fig. 122, in which O represents a strip of steel fastened at one end into one segment and at the other end to the other segment.

Sometimes, indeed, where great accuracy is requisite, two pieces of steel are thus employed, the second one being shown at P P, in the figure. The surfaces of these pieces should exactly coincide with the edge of the segments.

[Ill.u.s.tration: Fig. 122.]

[Ill.u.s.tration: Fig. 123.]

[Ill.u.s.tration: Fig. 124.]

[Ill.u.s.tration: Fig. 125.]

[Ill.u.s.tration: Fig. 126.]

The curve templates thus produced being shaped to apply to the pitch circle may be correctly applied to that circle independently of its concentricity to the wheel axis or of the points of the teeth, but if the points of the teeth are turned in the lathe so as to be true (that is, concentric to the wheel axis) the form of the template may be such as shown in Fig. 123, the radius of the arc A A equalling that of the addendum circle or circ.u.mference at the points of the teeth, and the width at B (the pitch circle) equaling the width of a s.p.a.ce instead of the thickness of a tooth. The curves on each side of the template may in this case be filed for the full side of a tooth on each side of the template so that it will completely fill the finished s.p.a.ce, or the sides of two contiguous teeth may be marked at one operation. This template may be set to the marks made on the teeth at the pitch circle to denote their requisite thickness, or for greater accuracy, a similar template made double so as to fill two finished tooth s.p.a.ces may be employed, the advantage being that in this case the template also serves to mark or test the thickness of the teeth. Since, however, a double template is difficult to make, a more simple method is to provide for the thickness of a tooth, the template shown in Fig. 124, the width from A to B being either the thickness of tooth required or twice the thickness of a tooth plus the width of a s.p.a.ce, so that it may be applied to the outsides of two contiguous teeth. The arc C may be made both in its radius and distance from the pitch circle D D to equal that of the addendum circle, so as to serve as a gauge for the tooth points, if the latter are not turned true in the lathe, or to rest on the addendum circle (if the teeth points are turned true), and adjust the pitch circle D D to the pitch circle on the wheel.

The curves for the template must be very carefully filed to the lines produced by the rolling segments, because any error in the template is copied on every tooth marked from it. Furthermore, instead of drawing the pitch circle only, the addendum circle and circle for the roots of the teeth or s.p.a.ces should also be drawn, so that the template may be first filed to them, and then adjusted to them while filing the edges to the curves.

Another form of template much used is shown in Fig. 125. The curves A and B are filed to the curve produced by rolling segments as before, and the holes C, D, E, are for fastening the template to an arm, such as shown in Fig. 126, which represents a section of a wheel W, with a plug P, fitting tightly into the hub H of the wheel. This plug carries at its centre a cylindrical pin on which pivots the arm A. The template T is fastened to the arm by screws, and set so that its pitch circle coincides with the pitch circle P on the wheel, when the curves for one side of all the teeth may be marked. The template must then be turned over to mark the other side of the teeth.

The objection to this form of template is that the length of arc representing the pitch circle is too short, for it is absolutely essential that the pitch line on the template (or line representing the arc of the addendum if that be used) be greater than the width of a single tooth, because an error of the thickness of a line (in the thickness of a tooth), in the coincidence of the pitch line of the template with that of the tooth, would throw the tooth curves out to an extent altogether inadmissible where true work is essential.