Memoranda on Poisons Part 1

Memoranda on Poisons.

by Thomas Hawkes Tanner.

PREFACE.

The present edition of Dr. Tanner's "Memoranda on Poisons" is in some respects almost a new book. It was, as will be seen by the Author's Preface to the last Edition, Dr. Tanner's object to furnish the pract.i.tioner with a useful guide to his duties in cases of poisoning.

Experience has, however, shown that the book is more useful to the student than to the pract.i.tioner; and, with a view to render it still more valuable to the former, it has in great measure been remodelled.

Whilst, therefore, due attention has been paid to what might be called the clinical aspects of poisoning, its chemical bearings have been more closely attended to; and the more important and reliable tests have in each instance been given, as have also the more important processes for separating poisons from organic admixture. Sick of the old and clumsy cla.s.sification of poisons into Irritants, Narcotics, and Narcotico-Irritants, the editor has endeavored to form some more rational groups of toxic agents. These groups are, it is true, quite provisional; and they are somewhat similar to those adopted by Dr. Guy in his admirable textbook on Forensic Medicine. They have, however, been worked out independently, whether they be worth anything or no. Briefly they are these:-

Corrosives.-Simple Irritants, Mineral, Vegetable, and Animal.-Irritant Gases.-Specific Irritants, Mineral, Vegetable, and Animal.-Neurotics: subdivided into Narcotics, Anaesthetics, Inebriants, Delirants, Convulsives, Hyposthenisants, Depressants, Asphyxiants,-and Abortives.

Such a grouping is far from perfect; but it would be impossible to have anything worse than that still in general use. It is with the hope of rendering this little volume more generally useful these changes have been made: a reason at all times all-powerful with its lamented Author.

A. S.

AUTHOR'S PREFACE

TO THE SECOND EDITION.

These Memoranda are intended to refresh the memory of the pract.i.tioner on a subject which is not brought under his notice so frequently as many other departments of medicine. They are especially adapted to show at a glance the treatment to be adopted in each particular instance of poisoning to which a medical man is liable to be summoned.

There seems reason to fear that the crime of slow poisoning is more extensively practised in the present day than is generally believed. The study of the following pages will, it is hoped, put the physician on his guard; and prevent his attributing to natural disease symptoms due to the villainous administration of deadly drugs.

HENRIETTA STREET, CAVENDISH SQUARE.

CHAPTER I.

DEFINITION AND MODE OF ACTION OF POISONS.

Toxicology (t?????? poison, and ????? discourse,) is that branch of medical science which treats of the nature, properties, and effects of poisons.

It appears scarcely possible to give any definition of a poison which will bear a critical examination; insomuch that some have preferred to deal with the evil effects of any substance, that is _poisoning_, rather than with the substance itself, the so-called _poison_. Most medicines are poisonous in improper doses; and even common salt (chloride of sodium) has caused death.[A] Dr. Guy defines a poison to be any substance which, when applied to the body externally, or in any way introduced into the system, without acting mechanically, but by its own inherent qualities, is capable of destroying life. A cherrystone may cause death by becoming arrested in the vermiform appendix, and thus producing peritonitis; boiling water may cause death also; but neither are poisons: the one acting mechanically, the other by its heat merely.

Any substance which can injure the health or destroy life is regarded as a poison, if given with the _intent_ to do mischief. The words of the statute (1 Vict. c. 85, sec. 2) are-"Whoever shall administer, or cause to be taken by any person, any poison, or other destructive thing, with intent to commit murder, shall be guilty of felony, and being convicted thereof shall suffer death." Sometimes poisons are administered, not for the purpose of destroying life, but of causing some slight injury or annoyance. An Act pa.s.sed in March, 1860 (23 Vict. c. 8), provides for the punishment of a guilty person under these circ.u.mstances. If life be endangered, or "grievous bodily harm" result, the administrator may be found guilty of felony, and sentenced to penal servitude for a term not exceeding ten years. If the intent be only to "injure, aggrieve, or annoy," the crime is reduced to a misdemeanor, punishable with an imprisonment for not more than three years.

In accordance with the Pharmacy Act certain substances have been defined as poisons within the meaning of the Act, so as to put some restriction on their sale to the public.

Poisons may be introduced into the body in various ways and in various forms. Thus they may be administered by the mouth or by the r.e.c.t.u.m, and they may be given in the form of solids, liquids, or gases, uncombined, or mixed with various matters. Some agents are more readily absorbed than others; whilst some textures permit of absorption taking place more quickly through them than other tissues. Thus, the most diffusible poisons prove most rapidly fatal, especially when introduced directly into the circulation by a wound in a vein, or when they are injected into the subcutaneous connective tissue. Their action is also speedy when applied either in a gaseous state to the pulmonary air-cells, or as a fluid to that of the stomach or intestines. The serous membranes, too, possess an activity of absorption almost superior to that of the mucous membranes; while absorption through the skin is slow, on account of the cuticle. Poisons taken into the stomach when that viscus is empty, necessarily act much more speedily than when it is full. It is remarkable that the agents which most affect the nervous system do not appear to act at all when applied directly to the brain or trunks of nerves. There are also some poisons, as that of the viper, which, although most deadly when introduced into the blood through a wound, are harmless when swallowed.

The effects of poisons may be considered as _local_ and _remote_.

The _local_ effects are mainly of three kinds, viz., _corrosion_, or chemical decomposition, as is seen in the effects of the strong mineral acids and alkalies; _irritation_ or _inflammation_, varying from simple redness, in its mildest, to ulceration and gangrene, in its most severe degree, such as may result from the use of corrosive sublimate; and _a local specific effect_, produced on the sentient extremities of the nerves, as is felt on the local application of prussic acid, aconite, &c.

The _remote_ effects are those influencing organs remote from the part to which the poison has been applied. These may be either common or specific; _common_, such as the const.i.tutional indications of inflammatory fever, however produced; _specific_, like the const.i.tutional effects of opium over and above its local influences in relieving pain, &c. Various narcotic poisons produce but little local change, though their remote effects are very remarkable. For example, belladonna, in whatever way it may be introduced into the system, paralyzes the ciliary nerves and so causes dilatation of the pupil. Many substances have both a local and remote action, as is well seen in the influence of cantharides upon the part to which they are applied, and their remote effects upon the urinary organs.

These remote effects must be induced by one of two modes, or, as some contend, by both: by _absorption_, that is, by the pa.s.sage of the poisonous particles into the blood; or by _sympathy_, that is, by an impression transmitted through the nerves.

In the present day every one allows that poisons may become absorbed, and that, provided they produce poisonous effects at all, they are absorbed, in whatever way they may have been applied to the body. But it is sometimes asked, Is this absorption necessary for their action? The following evidence may be briefly noticed as in some degree affording an affirmative answer to this question. Magendie divided all the parts of one of the posterior extremities of a dog, the artery and vein being reconnected by quills, so as to preclude the possibility of the effects being conveyed by the nervous filaments supplying the coats of the vessels; on applying a portion of upas tieute to a wound in the foot, the symptoms of poisoning occurred, and death took place in ten minutes.

If the veins leading from a poisoned part be tied, the arterial and nervous communication being complete, the symptoms of poisoning do not occur. Mr. Blake introduced some prussic acid into the stomach of a dog, through an opening in its parietes, after he had ligatured the vessel entering the liver (the vena portae, which, directly or indirectly, receives the gastric veins); no effect ensued until the removal of the ligature, within one minute of which proceeding the poison began to act.

And lastly, not only has prussic acid been discovered in the blood of an animal which perished in thirty-five seconds, but in some experiments made by Mr. Erichsen, in a case of extroversion of the bladder, prussiate of pota.s.s was found in the urine within one minute of its being swallowed on an empty stomach.

The chief argument in favor of a _sympathetic_ or direct nerve action, is the almost instantaneous manner in which some poisons act; fatal effects occurring, it is said, before sufficient time has elapsed to allow of absorption. It has, however, been proved that the round of the circulation may be accomplished much more speedily than has been imagined. Thus, the ferrocyanide of pota.s.sium injected into the jugular vein of a horse was discovered throughout the entire venous system in twenty-seconds; and Mr. Blake has inferred from his experiments that a poison may be diffused through the body in nine seconds. It may therefore be concluded that in most instances poisons act by being absorbed and conveyed with the blood to the different organs which they impair, or the nerve centres which rule the functions of these; some paralyzing the heart when they reach it, some affecting the brain or the spinal cord, some stopping the play of the lungs and others acting upon the different glands. Nevertheless, in view of the extreme rapidity with which death is brought about in a few instances, the possibility of a direct shock to the nervous system causing death must not be overlooked.

The action of a poison may be variously modified, and the modifying circ.u.mstances must be carefully taken into consideration in the formation of a prognosis and in suggesting a line of treatment.

The _quant.i.ty_ or _dose_ is the most important of these; many substances which are deadly in large doses being exceedingly useful as remedies in small quant.i.ties; such are prussic acid, opium, digitalis, a.r.s.enic, &c.

Then again, the _mechanical_ and _chemical_ state of aggregation are all-important; a solid being usually much less active than a fluid or a gas, and a pure substance much more active than one mixed with insoluble materials. Even more important is the chemical const.i.tution of the poisonous agent; as already pointed out, poisonous effects result from absorption of the poisoning body and absorption implies solution; the more soluble, therefore, the compound is, the more speedy are its effects, whilst compounds insoluble in water or any of the juices of the body are inert. It is not, however, enough that the substance be insoluble in water; it must be so also in the gastric juice, or it may give rise to characteristic symptoms. Thus, calomel is insoluble in water, yet it is a powerful medicine; orpiment is insoluble in water, yet when swallowed, it may give rise to symptoms of a.r.s.enical poisoning, and so on. As already pointed out, the mode in which the poison is introduced into the body is of great consequence in estimating its effects. Then again the _mental_ and _bodily condition_ of the recipient must be taken into account. Thus, in excited maniacs doses of medicines may be given without producing any effect which in ordinary individuals might give rise to serious consequences. The bodily condition, especially as influenced by habit, is still more important. It may be broadly stated, that by gradually increasing the dose of a substance ordinarily poisonous, in course of time enormous quant.i.ties may be borne without producing immediate ill effects. This is especially seen in the practice of opium eating and smoking, and in a less degree in a.r.s.enic eating, as practised in Styria. The latter instance is, however, contrary to the usual rule; for whereas with vegetable substances, such as opium the dose requires to be constantly increased to keep up the effects, with minerals, the contrary seems to be the case, especially with antimony and mercury, which cannot be long given without danger to the recipient.

CHAPTER II.

DIAGNOSIS OF POISONING-DUTIES OF THE PRACt.i.tIONER.

The chief characteristics of poisoning mentioned by authors of repute are, that the symptoms commence suddenly after taking any substance or fluid into the stomach, the individual being in a state of health; that they increase steadily, and are uniform in their nature throughout their course; and that they prove rapidly fatal. There are many exceptions to these rules. Thus if the stomach be loaded the appearance of the symptoms will often be delayed some few hours. Sleep, according to Dr.

Christison, may r.e.t.a.r.d the action of some agents; so that if a person fall asleep soon after swallowing a.r.s.enic or strychnia, for example, no effect may ensue for four or five hours. Intoxication will mask the effect of narcotics. Again, the individual poisoned may possibly be suffering from disease, and an agent may be given which will only aggravate existing symptoms. The fact must not be forgotten that sometimes a poisonous draught is subst.i.tuted for a harmless medicine.

And lastly, after a poison has manifested its effects the symptoms often remit for a time.

When poison is administered with a criminal intent it is generally in such a dose as to take immediate effect, although this is by no means necessary, as there are numerous substances which acc.u.mulate in the system, and when given in small and repeated quant.i.ties, ultimately prove fatal. It must also be remembered that there are many diseases, as malignant cholera, internal hemorrhage, &c., which commence suddenly, and rapidly run to a fatal termination. In inflammation of the stomach or intestines the symptoms often set in suddenly, and might be mistaken for poisoning; such is also the case in intestinal obstruction, and especially in ulceration and perforation of the bowels. So also in organic diseases of the heart, where the symptoms may have remained latent for some time, death often occurs suddenly from syncope. The diagnosis of the effects of irritant poisons is not so difficult as it is in the case of narcotics or other neurotics, where the symptoms are very similar to those produced by apoplexy, epilepsy, teta.n.u.s, convulsions, or disease of the brain.

Generally speaking, a person may be supposed to be suffering under the effects of a poison, if soon after taking food or drink, he be seized with violent pain, vomiting, disorder of the alimentary ca.n.a.l, and convulsive movements: or if he be attacked under the same circ.u.mstances with vertigo, delirium, or great drowsiness. It must not be forgotten, however, that poisons may be introduced into the body, not only by the mouth, but also by means of suppositories and enemata, or in females by v.a.g.i.n.al injections, or by inhalation, or by subcutaneous injection, or through the true skin after the removal of the cuticle. Should death ensue, the presumption of unfair play will of course be strengthened by the discovery of post-mortem appearances similar to those known to be produced by the poison from which the person apparently suffered.

The post-mortem appearances, however, except in a few instances, are not very characteristic; nevertheless they may be of great _negative_ value in proving that a certain poison has not been administered, or that the patient died from the effects of disease. Two symptoms, excessive lividity of the body and early putrefaction, formerly supposed to indicate death by poison, are now known to frequently follow other modes of death. It may nevertheless be remarked, that the appearances after death which may be produced by poisons are, in one great cla.s.s, the signs of inflammation of the alimentary ca.n.a.l; in another, the signs of congestion of the nervous system; and in a third, a combination of the two.

The detection of poison in some of the food which has been left untaken or in the matters vomited would seem to be conclusive evidence of the administration of poison; but it is to be recollected that designing persons have mixed noxious materials with food or rejected matters, in order to feign poisoning, or to cast unjust imputations upon others.

When called to a case of supposed poisoning during life the pract.i.tioner's duty is two-fold. His first aim must of course be to preserve life (see next chapter); his second, to forward the interests of justice. But if he reaches the spot too late to save life his duties are undivided, for he has but to see that justice is done, and in order that there be no failure it is important that all his observations be committed as speedily as possible to writing. He should inquire the time at which any substance was last taken, the nature of the symptoms, the hour at which they commenced, and the precise time at which death occurred. He must take possession of any food, medicine, vomited matters, urine, or faeces which may be in the room; and if possible he is to seal them up, in new and clean vessels, duly labelled, for examination. Then the position and temperature of the body are to be observed, the appearance of the countenance, the presence or absence of rigor mortis, with the nature and warmth of the apartment, the situation of any marks of violence, and the condition of the inside of the mouth and gullet. In addition to the ordinary rules to be observed in conducting post-mortem examinations in cases of suspected poisoning, something more must be done with a view to preserving portions of the body for subsequent examination. The alimentary ca.n.a.l is the most important organ to be thus secured, and it should be removed in separate portions. A double ligature should be pa.s.sed round the sophagus in the chest, and the duodenum a few inches below the pylorus should be secured in like manner; by cutting across the gullet and gut between these ligatures, the stomach may be removed without any danger of spilling its contents. It is best to open the stomach after it has been introduced into the receptacle prepared for it, so that its pathological condition may be noted as early as possible. Another ligature should be tied low down in the r.e.c.t.u.m, and the intestines removed and introduced into a separate vessel prepared for them and then examined like the stomach. Sometimes it may be necessary to remove the gullet in like fashion. As much blood as possible should be saved for the chemist, and a portion of the liver, if not the whole organ, should also be secured.

When everything has been tied up, the jars should be sealed, numbered, labelled, and initialled, to prevent subsequent confusion and to facilitate identification. In women the v.a.g.i.n.a, uterus and ovaries must be inspected, the brain, spinal cord and thoracic viscera ought likewise to be examined, and portions of the spleen, kidneys, and muscles should be reserved for a.n.a.lysis. No antiseptic or preservative fluid is to be used. When possible it will be best to make the autopsy within twenty-four hours after death; taking care to make the examination patiently, thoroughly, and with a mind free from any bias. Poison may be found in a body, and yet a question may arise as to its having been the cause of death. Hence in these investigations every organ of the body is to be examined, in order to learn whether any disease has existed sufficient to account for the fatal result.

Any suspicious conduct on the part of those surrounding the poisoned individual should be carefully noted. Acts of this kind arrange themselves in three heads, as occurring before, or during the fatal illness, or after death. With the first category the pract.i.tioner has ordinarily nothing to do, but his attention to those coming under the second and third is often of essential service to the ends of justice.

The kind of acts will suggest themselves to every one, and need not be further referred to here.