Essays on the Constitution of the United States Part 31

MRS. TIMOTHY:

The enclosed,(64) copied from a paper sent me by a friend, seems so peculiarly adapted to our present situation, that I cannot forbear selecting it from the crowd of publications since the appearance of the proposed Federal Const.i.tution, and recommending it, thro' your paper, to the most serious attention of all our fellow-citizens; but previously a few HINTS, by way of introduction, will not, I hope, be impertinent.

New Hampshire and Georgia are the two extreme barriers of the United States, if the latter can with any propriety be called a barrier without this state in conjunction; and both together, we know, are not, in point of force, ready for any sudden emergency, to be compared to New Hampshire.

It cannot be doubted that Great Britain has her busy emissaries throughout the states, and not a few amongst us; and should the Const.i.tution be rejected, how long can we flatter ourselves to be free from Indian cruelties and depredations, some time since begun in Georgia, and if at this moment warded off from us, 'tis princ.i.p.ally owing to the dread of an efficacious union of the states by the adoption of the Federal Const.i.tution. The three southern states particularly, we have had for several years past, good grounds to think Great Britain wishes to separate from the rest, and to have reverted to her if possible.

Mr. Martin's(65) long mischievous detail of the opinions and proceedings of the late general convention, (already occupying a large s.p.a.ce in six of your Gazettes, and still unfinished,) with all his colourings and uncandid insinuations, in regard to General Washington and Doct. Franklin, may suit the short-sighted selfish wishes of _an individual_ of a state situated almost in the centre of the rest, and much safer by that means from sudden alarms. But the generous, manly _and truly federal sentiments of Maryland_ are well known, and 'tis not doubted will be unequivocally shewn at her convention very shortly to be held-and that New Hampshire, early in her first meeting on that important subject, has only by consent taken farther time to consider of it, and will at her next meeting adopt it, is the general opinion.

What pity the salutary caution of Doct. Franklin, just previous to his signing the const.i.tution recommended by the convention, had not been strictly attended to! If we split, it will in all probability happen in running headlong on the dangerous rock he so prophetically (as it were) warned us from, "That the opinions of the errors of the const.i.tution born within the walls of the convention, should die there, and not a syllable be whispered abroad." This Hint is full of that foresight and penetration the Doctor has always been remarkable for.

When the general convention met, no citizen of the United States could expect less from it than I did, so many jarring interests and prejudices to reconcile! The variety of pressing dangers at our doors, even during the war, were barely sufficient to force us to act in concert, and necessarily give way at times to each other. But when the great work was done and published, I was not only most agreeably disappointed, but struck with amazement. Nothing less than that superintending hand of Providence, that so miraculously carried us through the war (in my humble opinion), could have brought it about so complete, upon the whole.

The const.i.tution recommended, in all respects, takes its rise where it ought, from the people; its President, Senate, and House of Representatives, are sufficient and wholesome checks on each other, and at proper periods are dissolved again into the common ma.s.s of the people: longer periods would probably have produced danger; shorter, tumult, instability and inefficacy. Every article of these and other essentials to a republican government, are, in my opinion, well secured; were it otherwise, not a citizen of the United States would have been more alarmed, or more early in opposition to it, than

A STEADY AND OPEN REPUBLICAN.

_Charleston, May 2d, 1788._

BIBLIOGRAPHY.

[This list is only of those essays to which some clue of authorship has been found. When written over a pen name the pseudonym is added.-_Ed._]

Brackenridge, Hugh Henry.

Pittsburg Gazette.

Bryan, Samuel. "Centinel."

Independent Gazetteer.

Carroll, Daniel. "A Friend to the Const.i.tution."

Maryland Journal.

Chase, Samuel. "Caution."

Maryland Journal.

Clinton, De Witt. "A Countryman."

New York Journal.

Clinton, George. "Cato."

New York Journal.

c.o.xe, Tench. "A Freeman."

Pennsylvania Gazette.

c.o.xe, Tench. "An American."

Independent Gazetteer.

c.o.xe, Tench. "A Pennsylvanian."

Pennsylvania Gazette.

Duer, William. "Philo-Publius."

Daily Advertiser.

Davie, William Richardson. "Publicola."

North Carolina State Gazette.

d.i.c.kinson, John. "Fabius."

Humphrey's Mercury.

Ellsworth, Oliver. "A Landholder."

Connecticut Courant.

Findley, William. "An Officer of the Continental Army."

Independent Gazetteer.

Gerry, Elbridge.

Ma.s.sachusetts Centinel.

Gerry, Elbridge.

American Herald.

Hamilton, Alexander. "Publius."

Various papers.

Hamilton, Alexander. "Caesar."

Daily Advertiser.

Hanson, Alexander Contee. "Aristides."

Maryland Journal.

Hopkinson, Francis. "A. B."

Independent Gazetteer.

Iredell, James. "Marcus."

North Carolina State Gazette.

Jay, John. "Publius."

Various papers.

Lamb, John. "Conciliator."

New York Journal.

McKnight, Dr. Charles. "The Examiner."

Daily Advertiser.