Carnifex. Part 65

Sergeant Major: Sergeant Major with no necessary indication of level 1st Centurion: Senior non-commissioned officer of a maniple Centurion: Senior non-commissioned officer of a maniple Senior Centurion: Master Sergeant but almost always the senior man within a platoon.

Centurion, J.G.: Sergeant First Cla.s.s, sometimes commands a platoon but is usually the second in command Optio: Staff Sergeant, typically the second in command of a platoon Sergeant: Sergeant, typically leads a squad Corporal: Corporal, typically leads a team or crew or serves as second in command of a squad Legionario, or Legionary, or Legionnaire: private through specialist Note that in addition, under pending Legion regulations, a soldier may elect to take what is called "Triarius Status." This will locks the soldier into whatever rank he may be, but allow pay raises for longevity to continue. It is one way the legion may flatten the rank pyramid in the interests of reducing careerism. Thus, one may someday hear or read of a "Triarius Tribune III," typically a major-equivalent who will have decided, with Legion accord, that his highest and best use is in a particular staff slot or commanding a particular maniple. Given that the Legion-with fewer than fifteen hundred officers, including signifers-has the smallest officer corps of any significant military formation on Terra Nova, and a very flat promotion pyramid, the Triarius system seems, perhaps, overkill. If adopted, regulations may permit but not require Triarius status legionaries to be promoted one rank upon retirement.

[1] If true and sincerely held, perhaps the good archbishop entered the priesthood to avoid committing incest. If true and sincerely held, perhaps the good archbishop entered the priesthood to avoid committing incest.

[2] Indeed, communist cosmopolitanism's circle is usually drawn by killing quickly, via rope or bullet, or slowly, via Gulag those who do not fit within it. It has generally done so with a forthright ruthlessness that even the n.a.z.is could only stand back and admire. Religions do this, too, of course, but they're amateurs in comparison to communism. One is tempted to say that communism draws its circle with headstones...but this would be wrong as the ma.s.s graves are almost invariably unmarked. Indeed, communist cosmopolitanism's circle is usually drawn by killing quickly, via rope or bullet, or slowly, via Gulag those who do not fit within it. It has generally done so with a forthright ruthlessness that even the n.a.z.is could only stand back and admire. Religions do this, too, of course, but they're amateurs in comparison to communism. One is tempted to say that communism draws its circle with headstones...but this would be wrong as the ma.s.s graves are almost invariably unmarked.

[3] You may have noted that families have parents and children, the parents being in charge. Have you ever noticed how often people who use phrases like "Family of Man" tend to think of themselves as the parents? Guess who they think of as children. You may have noted that families have parents and children, the parents being in charge. Have you ever noticed how often people who use phrases like "Family of Man" tend to think of themselves as the parents? Guess who they think of as children.

[4] And paid for by you. You know the ones: "feed, clothe and educate poor little Maritza for twenty-seven cents a day?" It doesn't work that way. Little Maritza, if she gets clothed, fed and educated at all, typically gets it from strings-attached government grants. Sadly, for the men and women who claim to be feeding little Maritza, those strings tend to exclude things like paying for mansions in Darien. In most unenlightened fashion, when governments give money to feed Little Maritza they actually insist that little Maritza be fed. Likewise stays at five star resorts for conferences are out. Likewise, flying first cla.s.s to those conferences is out. That's where And paid for by you. You know the ones: "feed, clothe and educate poor little Maritza for twenty-seven cents a day?" It doesn't work that way. Little Maritza, if she gets clothed, fed and educated at all, typically gets it from strings-attached government grants. Sadly, for the men and women who claim to be feeding little Maritza, those strings tend to exclude things like paying for mansions in Darien. In most unenlightened fashion, when governments give money to feed Little Maritza they actually insist that little Maritza be fed. Likewise stays at five star resorts for conferences are out. Likewise, flying first cla.s.s to those conferences is out. That's where your your no-strings-attached twenty-seven cents a day comes in. It can be used for the no-strings-attached twenty-seven cents a day comes in. It can be used for the important important things, mansions, luxury conferences, and first cla.s.s airline seats. See: things, mansions, luxury conferences, and first cla.s.s airline seats. See: The Road to h.e.l.l The Road to h.e.l.l, Michael Maren, The Free Press, 1997.

[5] Oh, yes, the mullahs take care of their own. This is one similarity between religious cosmopolitanism and non-religious cosmopolitanism. Oh, yes, the mullahs take care of their own. This is one similarity between religious cosmopolitanism and non-religious cosmopolitanism.

[6] So do the Chinese communists. In fact, they're So do the Chinese communists. In fact, they're especially especially good at taking care of their own. They put mere mullahs and simple Tranzis in the shade. From an article by Carsten A. Holz, in Far Eastern Economic Review, April, 2007: "Article after article pores over the potential economic reasons for the increase in income inequality in China. We ignore the fact that of the 3,220 Chinese citizens with a personal wealth of 100 million yuan ($13 million) or more, 2, 932 are children of high-level cadres. Of the key positions in the five industrial sectors-finance, foreign trade, land development, large-scale engineering and securities-85% to 90% are held by children of high-level cadres." good at taking care of their own. They put mere mullahs and simple Tranzis in the shade. From an article by Carsten A. Holz, in Far Eastern Economic Review, April, 2007: "Article after article pores over the potential economic reasons for the increase in income inequality in China. We ignore the fact that of the 3,220 Chinese citizens with a personal wealth of 100 million yuan ($13 million) or more, 2, 932 are children of high-level cadres. Of the key positions in the five industrial sectors-finance, foreign trade, land development, large-scale engineering and securities-85% to 90% are held by children of high-level cadres."

[7] Cosmopolitanism and Patriotism Cosmopolitanism and Patriotism, Boston Review 19:5 (October-November 1994).

[8] After all, there are always people like me willing to spice up a dull world literarily...and perhaps in other ways, too. After all, there are always people like me willing to spice up a dull world literarily...and perhaps in other ways, too.

[9] I'm deliberately leaving out of here the cosmopolitanism which would be justified, or at least theoretically justifiable, if people did actually reincarnate. This, of course, would presuppose that upon reincarnation we cross societal lines rather than, say, I'm deliberately leaving out of here the cosmopolitanism which would be justified, or at least theoretically justifiable, if people did actually reincarnate. This, of course, would presuppose that upon reincarnation we cross societal lines rather than, say, my my soul having to wait, a la Druze, for another Kratman baby to be born so that I can inhabit it. It also presupposes that, unlike Hinduism, where the boundaries between men are explicit in birth, reincarnation is purely random. I know of no significant form of cosmopolitanism that has its basis in reincarnation. Such a justification would, in any case, be highly speculative. soul having to wait, a la Druze, for another Kratman baby to be born so that I can inhabit it. It also presupposes that, unlike Hinduism, where the boundaries between men are explicit in birth, reincarnation is purely random. I know of no significant form of cosmopolitanism that has its basis in reincarnation. Such a justification would, in any case, be highly speculative.

[10] Ibid. Ibid.

[11] Interestingly, there's a draft declaration at the United Nations, the Interestingly, there's a draft declaration at the United Nations, the United Nations Draft Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, Article 7 of which decries, among other things, "cultural genocide," to include, "Any action which has the aim or effect of depriving them of their integrity as distinct peoples, or of their cultural values or ethnic ident.i.ties." I'd like to see that adopted, with a couple of definitions, and some criminal liability attached. Why? Well, if we define indigenous to include native-born, as we certainly might, then we could charge and try all those people who insist on forcibly inflicting upon our children foreign culture and values in place of our own for "Cultural Genocide." Be a hoot, wouldn't it?

[12] I am indebted to Professor Sam Huntington's I am indebted to Professor Sam Huntington's Who Are We Who Are We, Simon and Schuster, 2004, for this little tidbit.

[13] By the way, I don't mean here to insult Juan Robles, the MS-13 drug runner and a.s.sa.s.sin, nor his organization, by invidious comparison to, say, Ford or Microsoft. At least Juan has loyalty to something beyond money and genes. And MS-13, at least, can generate loyalty that is not merely bought and paid for. By the way, I don't mean here to insult Juan Robles, the MS-13 drug runner and a.s.sa.s.sin, nor his organization, by invidious comparison to, say, Ford or Microsoft. At least Juan has loyalty to something beyond money and genes. And MS-13, at least, can generate loyalty that is not merely bought and paid for.

[14] "If smarts were people, Lee Harris would be China." Jonah Goldberg "If smarts were people, Lee Harris would be China." Jonah Goldberg [15] Lee Harris, Lee Harris, The Cosmopolitan Illusion The Cosmopolitan Illusion, Policy Review, April/May 2003. Other things have, too: religion, region, sect and race, for example. They all draw circles that the nation has often been able to surmount.

[16] For an equally good, and perhaps better, example, consider the break-up of India following the end of the British Raj caused that that peerless cosmopolitan, Gandhi. For an equally good, and perhaps better, example, consider the break-up of India following the end of the British Raj caused that that peerless cosmopolitan, Gandhi.

[17] Ibid. Ibid.

[18] Though a cynical man, which of course I am not, can hardly help but note the potential for Anthropocentric (man-made) Global Warming to fill this need for an external threat to draw people together. It would be paranoid to say this is the motive. It is not paranoid to note how very Though a cynical man, which of course I am not, can hardly help but note the potential for Anthropocentric (man-made) Global Warming to fill this need for an external threat to draw people together. It would be paranoid to say this is the motive. It is not paranoid to note how very convenient convenient AGW is. AGW is.

[19] See, e.g., the French. For that matter, see ,e.g. Europe. See, e.g., the French. For that matter, see ,e.g. Europe.

[20] There's a lesson in there, I think, about how any form of cosmopolitanism must ultimately deal with those who do not accept its teachings. There's a lesson in there, I think, about how any form of cosmopolitanism must ultimately deal with those who do not accept its teachings.

THE END.