Wild Justice Part 32

"You mean forms and such like? Don't they have other people's writing on them besides Trenchant's?"

"Oh, yes, but that doesn't matter. The main thing is we got confirmation. The guy will testify to that and then those d.a.m.n lady-professors are going to toe the line, or else."

"You've already sent Trenchant the copies and notice of the next hearing?"

"Yup. Did it this morning. Same mail as I sent it to the rest of the committee."

"Seems as though it would have been simpler just to have her write something in front of witnesses and use those originals instead of farting around all this time with copies," a.n.u.se suggested.

"This process has taken nearly a year already."

"There's reasons. Not something you and I have to know about, but there's reasons. Anyway, here's your copy. Enjoy."

Chapter 30

A registered package arrived for Diana. It contained copies of the 'suspect' SmurFFs and copies of the standards that she had seen before at the hearing. Also enclosed were many other doc.u.ments, apparently copied from microfiche files.

These copies were atrocious, all spotty with black dots and lines.

Most of the letters were blurred and some parts were unreadable.

The package also contained a report from another doc.u.ment examiner.

This one agreed that Diana had written six of the eight doc.u.ments sent to them for a.n.a.lysis, but was not sure of two of them.

Just like the previous examiners--except it wasn't the same two they indicated.

Nevertheless, the cover letter, signed by Henry, decreed that this was supportive testimony and the hearing would reconvene in five days to present this evidence formally to Diana.

At that time she would be given an opportunity to cross examine the so-called expert testimony of the doc.u.ment examiner.

This time Henry was taking no chances. This time, the doc.u.ment examiner was male.

Diana and her supporters were not terribly surprised by contents of the package. It did, however, confirm that as far as the Belmont administration was concerned, she would be convicted even if they had to move heaven and earth to prove it.

The initial hearing of three days, the official protocol, the declarations of good faith made by the panel members-- all a sham. She'd waited long enough. It was time to seek help outside of Belmont U.

Part of her decision to take this path was made in response to the outpouring of support from the staff, faculty and students of Belmont.

These people, many of whom felt repressed themselves, knew that there was no way that justice or fairness could be brought about within the university structure. Anyone who had experience with university politics completely subscribed to the dubious accolade that university politics were the meanest of all types known to exist.

Many were angry that the whole rotten business evolved around a mere seven out of several hundred forms--all of which in the normal course of events would have been ignored.

There was frustration as well. They felt helpless and many were sickened at their lack of ability to effect any change.

By sending money to Diana, "to help with legal expenses,"

they could mitigate their helplessness and their fear.

Efforts were initiated to bring the affair before the Faculty Senate but they were quashed as soon as they started by the new Senate president, former ombudsman, Jonathan Bambridge.

Trustees were approached by supporters as well as university alumni groups. There was sympathy, but no one wanted to risk their position against the very real power wielded by the administration.

Several women faculty went to the Pope and pleaded for him to intercede.

These were brave women. They took to the meeting with the university president examples of many cases of proven misconduct that had occurred on campus. In every case, no man had ever been terminated. They reminded him that this was the first time at Belmont that a termination for cause charge had been made, and that it was against a woman.

The group of faculty women begged him to reconsider. To press such minuscule charges in the first place had been a mistake.

The information had spread across campus, the town and the state, making almost every person who heard of it laugh at first, then as they realized that it was not a joke become indignant.

"The publicity already has been harmful and it can only get worse if this hearing is continued," one of the professors urgently stated to The Pope. "Why do you continue with this?"

They were told that the decision to prosecute was final and that there was nothing they could do. Then they were shown the door.

The same sort of treatment was given to staff and students except that they usually got shorter shrift. Islands of concerned people protested but never joined in concert.

It was not a safe undertaking at Belmont University. Not if you wanted to keep your position. As Edmund Burke observed, "When bad men combine, the good must a.s.sociate; else they will fall one by one, an unpitied sacrifice in a contemptible struggle."

The final straw that tipped the balance and sent Diana to an attorney to fight the inevitable termination was an editorial that appeared in THE PROD, the Belmont student newspaper.

In a strongly worded article it condemned the undemocratic judicial process of the Belmont administration, which flouted the laws of the state and made up its own to fit each occasion.

The editorial compared Belmont's disciplinary process to feudal times.

It was t.i.tled:

PUNISHING THE VICTIM

. . .Dr. Diana Trenchant was accused of wrong doing.

Therefore, she was tried by a jury of her accusers in accordance with university policy.

Although two witness, who in any court would be called 'expert' witnesses, testified against her, she was not allowed an adequate defense--that is, the service of an attorney who would be competent to cross examine so-called expert testimony.

She was also not allowed access to doc.u.ments needed in her own defense.

She will most certainly be summarily terminated-- deprived of her livelihood without due process-- another victim of Belmont Kangaroo Kort Justice.

"That does it," she told Andrea and James whose support had never wavered throughout the ordeal. "I refuse to be one of Burke's 'unpitied sacrifice'. More specifically, I refuse to be their victim. Perhaps the courts can do something.

Let's give it a shot."

The women on the panel took a lot of heat for the reconvening of the hearing. Ricocheting across campus were the whisperings and lamentations of Esther as she endeavored to absolve herself from blame.

Jane's battle with her conscience reached only the ears of her closest friends, but her glacial features and bent posture bespoke her frustration and her impotency.

The saddest of all was Annette who had quietly borne the conflicting waves of testimony that flowed over her at the hearing. She had dared to speak up a couple of times, but now she knew that it had been a mistake.

Whatever Henry asked her to sign, she would sign. Without question, without hesitation, but not with good conscience. His visit to her and his carefully chosen words concerning his knowledge of her life-style had left no doubt remaining that the threat of exposure was real.

Diana found out early on that it would be unwise to place too much confidence in the judicial system. She discovered that a court cares nothing about right or wrong, good or bad.

It cares only about what the law is, can you prove it, and who proves it in the most entertaining manner.

The Attorney General had told Diana that an additional hazard was that this was a civil rights case--s.e.x discrimination.

The current federal administration had knocked the h.e.l.l out of most of the laws pertaining to s.e.x or age discrimination and greatly weakened any remaining. The EEOC was acting like a toothless p.u.s.s.y cat under the direction of a staunch ReaganBush conservative whose payoff would be a seat on the Supreme Court.