The Planters of Colonial Virginia - novelonlinefull.com
You’re read light novel The Planters of Colonial Virginia Part 13 online at NovelOnlineFull.com. Please use the follow button to get notification about the latest chapter next time when you visit NovelOnlineFull.com. Use F11 button to read novel in full-screen(PC only). Drop by anytime you want to read free – fast – latest novel. It’s great if you could leave a comment, share your opinion about the new chapters, new novel with others on the internet. We’ll do our best to bring you the finest, latest novel everyday. Enjoy
[4-87] Virginia Magazine of History and Biography, Vol. IX, p. 27.
[4-88] Virginia Magazine of History and Biography, Vol. X, p. 271.
NOTES TO CHAPTER V
[5-1] G. L. Beer, The Old Colonial System, Vol. II, p. 109.
[5-2] British Public Record Office, CO5-1315, Doc.u.ment 26, Correspondence of the Board of Trade.
?[5-3] P. A. Bruce, Economic History of Virginia, Vol. I, p.
401.
?[5-4] R. L. Beer, The Old Colonial System, Vol. I, p. 160.
?[5-5] British Public Record Office, CO5-1316, Perry and Hyde to the Lords of Trade, Correspondence of the Board of Trade.
?[5-6] British Public Record Office, CO5-1316, The Present State of the Tobacco Plantations in America, Correspondence of the Board of Trade.
[5-7] British Public Record Office, CO5-1316, Correspondence of the Board of Trade; Statutes of the Realm, Vol. IX, p. 917.
[5-8] Virginia Magazine of History and Biography, Vol. I, pp. 141-155.
[5-9] British Public Record Office, CO1-16, Pet.i.tion of Berkeley and Others, Aug. 26, 1662.
[5-10] British Public Record Office, CO1-20, Thomas Ludwell to Secretary Arlington, May 1, 1666.
[5-11] British Public Record Office, CO1-20, Sir William Berkeley and others to Secretary Arlington, July 13, 1666.
[5-12] British Public Record Office, CO1-20, Sir William Berkeley and others to Secretary Arlington, July 13, 1666.
[5-13] British Public Record Office, CO1-21, Thomas Ludwell to Lord Arlington, Feb. 12, 1667.
[5-14] British Public Record Office, CO1-21, Thomas Ludwell to Lord John Berkeley.
[5-15] British Public Record Office, CO1-23, p. 19, Ludwell to Lord Arlington.
[5-16] British Public Record Office, CO1-21, Governor and Council to the King.
[5-17] British Public Record Office, CO1-30, p. 51, Pet.i.tion of the Governor and Council.
[5-18] British Public Record Office, CO5-1356, p. 408, Report of the Council to the King.
[5-19] British Public Record Office, CO5-1355, p. 385, Colonial Entry Book.
[5-20] British Public Record Office, CO1-23, p. 19, Ludwell to Lord Arlington, July 20, 1665.
[5-21] British Public Record Office, CO5-1371, p. 246, Colonial Entry Book.
[5-22] British Public Record Office, CO5-1371, pp. 232-240, Dialogue Between John Good and Nathaniel Bacon, Colonial Entry Book, 1677.
[5-23] British Public Record Office, CO1-30, p. 51, Pet.i.tion of the Governor and Council to the King, July 1673.
[5-24] British Public Record Office, CO5-1355, p. 410, Colonial Entry Book.
[5-25] British Public Record Office, CO5-1356, p. 179, Colonial Entry Book.
[5-26] G. L. Beer, The Old Colonial System, Vol. II, p. 147.
[5-27] British Public Record Office, CO5-1371, p. 276, Colonial Entry Book.
[5-28] British Public Record Office, CO5-1371, p. 276, Colonial Entry Book.
[5-29] This view of the matter has the support of the dean of Virginia historians, Dr. Philip Alexander Bruce. Dr. Bruce writes: "No less an authority than Robert Beverley, the historian, states that the Navigation Acts had a sensible influence in precipitating Bacon's Rebellion. In the early life of this writer he must have been closely a.s.sociated with hundreds of people who had been through the uprising, and knew much, by direct observation, of the currents that governed it.
The elder Beverley was thoroughly informed and thus, in his own home, the son had the best of opportunities of learning the truth. Beverley himself declared that the Acts were causing discontent among the people, long before the Rebellion actually occurred, and so did John Bland in his memorable pet.i.tion. There is no doubt that the Acts, by keeping alive a sense of friction, left the people in just the state of mind to seize with eagerness on the more palpable wrongs which were specifically brought forward as the justification for resistance. It was really the groundwork of the movement, though if it had been the only cause, might not have precipitated open resistance to the Government."
[5-30] G. L. Beer, The Old Colonial System, Vol. II, p. 115.
[5-31] Secretary Thomas Ludwell in a long report to the British Government spoke of the Virginia Government as Berkeley's own, "Which I so term," he explains, "because he is the sole author of the most substantial parts of it, either for Lawes or other inferior inst.i.tutions." British Public Record Office, CO1-20.
[5-32] British Museum, Egerton Ma.n.u.script, 2395, f. 356b.
[5-33] British Public Record Office, CO1-19, Berkeley to Lord Arlington, Aug. 1, 1665.
?[5-34] P. A. Bruce, Economic History of Virginia, Vol. I, pp.
399-400.
[5-35] British Public Record Office, CO1-26-77, Berkeley to the Board of Trade.
[5-36] British Public Record Office, CO1-30-78, Memorial of John Knight, Oct. 29, 1673.
[5-37] British Public Record Office, CO1-30-71, Council of Virginia to the King, 1673.
[5-38] Peter Force, Tracts and Other Papers, Vol. II, New Description of Virginia, pp. 1-16.
[5-39] British Museum, Egerton Ma.n.u.script, 2395, f. 356b, A Discourse and View of Virginia.
[5-40] British Public Record Office, CO1-26-77, Berkeley to the Board of Trade.
[5-41] British Public Record Office, CO1-34-95, Pet.i.tion of Francis Moryson, Thomas Ludwell and Robert Smith.
[5-42] Virginia Land Patents, Register of Land Office, Virginia State Capitol.
[5-43] British Public Record Office, CO5-1359, pp. 20, 21, 22, Colonial Entry Book.
NOTES TO CHAPTER VI
