The Constitution of the United States of America: Analysis and Interpretation - novelonlinefull.com
You’re read light novel The Constitution of the United States of America: Analysis and Interpretation Part 53 online at NovelOnlineFull.com. Please use the follow button to get notification about the latest chapter next time when you visit NovelOnlineFull.com. Use F11 button to read novel in full-screen(PC only). Drop by anytime you want to read free – fast – latest novel. It’s great if you could leave a comment, share your opinion about the new chapters, new novel with others on the internet. We’ll do our best to bring you the finest, latest novel everyday. Enjoy
[754] Western U. Teleg. Co. _v._ New Hope, 187 U.S. 419, 425 (1903); Pure Oil Co. _v._ Minnesota, 248 U.S. 158, 162 (1918).
[755] New Mexico ex rel. McLean _v._ Denver & R.G.R. Co., 203 U.S. 38, 55 (1906). _Cf._ Red "C" Oil Mfg. Co. _v._ Board of Agriculture, 222 U.S. 380, 393 (1912); Western U. Teleg. Co. _v._ New Hope, 187 U.S. 419 (1903).
[756] Brimmer _v._ Rebman, 138 U.S. 78, 83 (1891); Postal Teleg. & Cable Co. _v._ Taylor, 192 U.S. 64 (1904); Pure Oil Co. _v._ Minnesota, 248 U.S. 158, 162 (1918).
[757] Atlantic & P. Teleg. Co. _v._ Philadelphia, 190 U.S. 160, 164 (1903); Postal Teleg. Cable Co. _v._ Taylor, 192 U.S. 64, 69 (1904); Foote & Co. _v._ Stanley, 232 U.S. 494, 503, 504 (1914).
[758] Foote & Co. _v._ Stanley, 232 U.S. 494, 505 (1914); Lugo _v._ Suazo, 59 F. (2d) 386 (1932).
[759] Western U. Teleg. Co. _v._ New Hope, 187 U.S. 419, 425 (1903); Foote & Co. _v._ Stanley, 232 U.S. 494, 507 (1914).
[760] Postal Teleg. Cable Co. _v._ New Hope, 192 U.S. 55 (1904); Foote & Co. _v._ Stanley, 232 U.S. 494, 508 (1914).
[761] 10 Stat. 112. Sustained in Pennsylvania _v._ Wheeling & Belmont Bridge Co., 18 How. 421 (1856).
[762] Pennsylvania _v._ Wheeling & Belmont Bridge Co., 13 How. 518 (1852).
[763] Transportation Co. _v._ Parkersburg, 107 U.S. 691, 701 (1883).
[764] 322 U.S. 533 (1944).
[765] 59 Stat. 33 (1945).
[766] 328 U.S. 408 (1946).
[767] Ibid. 429-430, 434-435.
[768] _See_ pp. 163-172.
[769] 9 Wheat. 1 (1824).
[770] Ibid. 203.
[771] 12 Wheat. 419 (1827).
[772] Ibid. 443-444.
[773] _Cf._ 12 Wheat. at 439-440.
[774] 11 Pet. 102 (1837).
[775] Smith _v._ Turner (Pa.s.senger Cases), 7 How. 283 (1849).
[776] Henderson _v._ New York, 92 U.S. 259 (1876).
[777] Ibid. 272.
[778] Chy Lung _v._ Freeman, 92 U.S. 275 (1876).
[779] Compagnie Francaise de Navigation _v._ Bd. of Health, 186 U.S.
380, 398, (1902). _See also_ Morgan's L. & T.R.S.S. Co. _v._ Bd. of Health, 118 U.S. 455 (1886); Louisiana _v._ Texas, 176 U.S. 1, 21 (1900).
[780] 211 U.S. 31, 36-37 (1908).
[781] As to concessions by the Court to the practical necessities of enforcement, _see also_ Bayside Fish Flour Co. _v._ Gentry, 297 U.S. 422 (1936); and Whitfield _v._ Ohio, 297 U.S. 431 (1936).
[782] 325 U.S. 761, 766-767.
[783] Ibid. 767; citing: Minnesota Rate Cases, 230 U.S. 352, 399, 400 (1913); South Carolina Highway Dept. _v._ Barnwell Bros., 303 U.S. 177, 187 (1938), et seq.; California _v._ Thompson, 313 U.S. 109, 113, 114 (1941) and cases cited; Parker _v._ Brown, 317 U.S. 341, 359, 360 (1943).
[784] 325 U.S. at 767; citing: Cooley _v._ Board of Wardens, 12 How. at 319 (1851); South Carolina Highway Dept. _v._ Barnwell Bros., 303 U.S.
at 185; California _v._ Thompson, 313 U.S. at 113; Duckworth _v._ Arkansas, 314 U.S. 390, 394 (1941); Parker _v._ Brown, 317 U.S. at 362, 363.
[785] 325 U.S. at 767; citing: South Carolina Highway Dept. _v._ Barnwell Bros., 303 U.S. at 188 and cases cited; Lone Star Gas Co. _v._ Texas, 304 U.S. 224, 238 (1938); Milk Board _v._ Eisenberg Co., 306 U.S.
346, 351 (1939); Maurer _v._ Hamilton, 309 U.S. 598, 603 (1940); California _v._ Thompson, 313 U.S. 113, 114 and cases cited.
[786] 325 U.S. at 767, 768; citing: Cooley _v._ Board of Wardens, 12 How. at 319 (1851); Leisy _v._ Hardin, 135 U.S. 100, 108, 109 (1890); Minnesota Rate Cases, 230 U.S. at 399, 400 (1913); Edwards _v._ California, 314 U.S. 160, 176 (1941).
[787] 325 U.S. at 768; citing: Brown _v._ Maryland, 12 Wheat. 419, 447 (1827); Minnesota Rate Cases, 230 U.S. at 399, 400; Pennsylvania _v._ West Virginia, 262 U.S. 553, 596 (1923); Baldwin _v._ Seelig, 294 U.S.
511, 522 (1935); South Carolina Highway Dept. _v._ Barnwell Bros., 303 U.S. at 185 (1938).
[788] 325 U.S. at 768; citing: Welton _v._ Missouri, 91 U.S. 275, 282 (1876); Hall _v._ DeCuir, 95 U.S. 485, 490 (1878); Brown _v._ Houston, 114 U.S. 622, 631 (1885); Bowman _v._ Chicago & N.W.R. Co., 125 U.S.
465, 481, 482 (1888); Leisy _v._ Hardin, 135 U.S. at 109; In re Rahrer, 140 U.S. 545, 559, 560 (1891); Brennan _v._ t.i.tusville, 153 U.S. 289, 302 (1894); Covington & C. Bridge Co. _v._ Kentucky, 154 U.S. 204, 212 (1894); Graves _v._ New York ex rel. O'Keefe, 306 U.S. 466, 479 (1939); Dowling, Interstate Commerce and State Power, 27 Va. Law Rev. 1 (1940).
[789] 325 U.S. at 769; citing: Parker _v._ Brown. 317 U.S. at 362 (1943); Terminal Railroad a.s.sn. _v._ Brotherhood, 318 U.S. 1, 8 (1943); _see_ Di Santo _v._ Pennsylvania, 273 U.S. 34, 44 (1927) (and compare California _v._ Thompson, 313 U.S. 109 (1941)); Illinois Gas Co. _v._ Public Service Co., 314 U.S. 498, 504, 505 (1942).
[790] 325 U.S. at 769; citing: Cooley _v._ Board of Wardens, 12 How. 299 (1851); Kansas City Southern R. Co. _v._ Kaw Valley District, 233 U.S.
75, 79 (1914); South Covington R. Co. _v._ Covington, 235 U.S. 537, 546 (1915); Missouri, K. & T.R. Co. _v._ Texas, 245 U.S. 484, 488 (1918); St. Louis & S.F.R. Co. _v._ Public Service Comm'n., 254 U.S. 535, 537 (1921): Foster-Fountain Packing Co. _v._ Haydel, 278 U.S. 1, 10 (1928); Gwin, White & Prince _v._ Henneford, 305 U.S. 434, 441 (1939); McCarroll _v._ Dixie Lines, 309 U.S. 176 (1940).
[791] 325 U.S. at 769; citing: In re Rahrer, 140 U.S. at 561, 562 (1891); Adams Express Co. _v._ Kentucky, 238 U.S. 190, 198 (1915); Rosenberger _v._ Pacific Express Co., 241 U.S. 48, 50, 51 (1916); Clark Distilling Co. _v._ Western Maryland R. Co., 242 U.S. 311, 325, 326 (1917); Whitfield _v._ Ohio, 297 U.S. 431, 438-440 (1936); Kentucky Whip & Collar Co. _v._ Illinois Central R. Co., 299 U.S. 334, 350, 351 (1937); Hooven & Allison Co. _v._ Evatt, 324 U.S. 652, 679 (1945).
[792] 325 U.S. at 769, 770; citing: Addyston Pipe & Steel Co. _v._ United States, 175 U.S. 211, 230 (1899); Louisville & Nashville R. Co.
_v._ Mottley, 219 U.S. 467 (1911); Houston, E. & W.T.R. Co. _v._ United States, 234 U.S. 342 (1914); American Express Co. _v._ Caldwell, 244 U.S. 617, 626 (1917); Illinois Central R. Co. _v._ Public Utilities Comm'n., 245 U.S. 493, 506 (1918); New York _v._ United States, 257 U.S.
591, 601 (1922); Louisiana Public Service Comm'n. _v._ Texas & N.O.R.
Co., 284 U.S. 125, 130 (1931); Pennsylvania R. Co. _v._ Illinois Brick Co., 297 U.S. 447, 459, (1936).
[793] 325 U.S. at 770; citing: Gwin, White & Prince _v._ Henneford, 305 U.S. 434, 441 (1939).
[794] 325 U.S. at 770; citing: Terminal Railroad a.s.sn. _v._ Brotherhood, 318 U.S. 1, 8 (1943); Southern R. Co. _v._ King, 217 U.S. 524 (1910).
[795] Peik _v._ Chicago & N.W.R. Co., 94 U.S. 164 (1877).
[796] Wabash, St. L. & P.R. Co. _v._ Illinois, 118 U.S. 557 (1886).
[797] 24 Stat. 379 (1887).
[798] Wisconsin Railroad Com. _v._ Chicago, B. & Q.R.R. Co., 257 U.S.
563 (1922).
