The Constitution of the United States of America: Analysis and Interpretation - novelonlinefull.com
You’re read light novel The Constitution of the United States of America: Analysis and Interpretation Part 40 online at NovelOnlineFull.com. Please use the follow button to get notification about the latest chapter next time when you visit NovelOnlineFull.com. Use F11 button to read novel in full-screen(PC only). Drop by anytime you want to read free – fast – latest novel. It’s great if you could leave a comment, share your opinion about the new chapters, new novel with others on the internet. We’ll do our best to bring you the finest, latest novel everyday. Enjoy
[179] Page _v._ United States, 127 U.S. 67 (1888).
[180] Long _v._ Ansell, 293 U.S. 76 (1934).
[181] Ibid. 83.
[182] United States _v._ Cooper, 4 Dall. 341 (1800).
[183] Williamson _v._ United States, 207 U.S. 425, 446 (1908).
[184] Kilbourn _v._ Thompson, 103 U.S. 168 (1881).
[185] Ibid.
[186] 4 Ma.s.s. 1 (1808).
[187] Kilbourn _v._ Thompson, 103 U.S. 168, 203, 204 (1881).
[188] Ibid. 205.
[189] Justice Frankfurter for the Court in Tenney _v._ Brandhove, 341 U.S. 367, 377 (1951). Justice Douglas dissented: "* * * I do not agree that all abuses of legislative committees are solely for the legislative body to police. We are dealing here with a right protected by the Const.i.tution--the right of free speech. The charge * * * is that a legislative committee brought the weight of its authority down on respondent for exercising his right of free speech. Reprisal for speaking is as much an abridgment as a prior restraint. If a committee departs so far from its domain [as?] to deprive a citizen of a right protected by the Const.i.tution, I can think of no reason why it should be immune". Ibid. 382. _See also_ Barsky _v._ United States, 167 F. (2d) 241 (1948); certiorari denied, 334 U.S. 843 (1948).
[190] Hinds' Precedents of the House of Representatives, I: -- 493 (1907); Cannon's Precedents of the House of Representatives, VI: ---- 63, 64 (1936).
[191] Hinds' Precedents of the House of Representatives, I: ---- 496-499 (1907).
[192] 34 Stat. 948 (1907).
[193] 35 Stat. 626 (1909).
[194] The situation gave rise to the case of Ex parte Albert Levitt, Pet.i.tioner, 302 U.S. 633 (1937). This was the case in which the Court declined to pa.s.s upon the validity of Justice Black's appointment. It seems curious that the Court, in rejecting pet.i.tioner's application, did not point out that it was being asked to a.s.sume original jurisdiction contrary to the decision in Marbury _v._ Madison, 1 Cr. 137 (1803).
[195] I Story, Const.i.tution, -- 880.
[196] Twin City Nat. Bank _v._ Nebeker, 167 U.S. 196 (1897).
[197] Millard _v._ Roberts, 202 U.S. 429 (1906).
[198] Flint _v._ Stone Tracy Co., 220 U.S. 107, 143 (1911).
[199] Rainey _v._ United States, 232 U.S. 310 (1914).
[200] La Abra Silver Mining Co. _v._ United States, 175 U.S. 423, 453 (1899).
[201] Edwards _v._ United States, 286 U.S. 482 (1932). On one occasion in 1936, delay in presentation of a bill enabled the President to sign it 23 days after the adjournment of Congress. Schmeckebier, Approval of Bills After Adjournment of Congress, 33 American Political Science Review 52 (1939).
[202] Gardner _v._ Collector, 6 Wall. 499 (1868).
[203] Ibid. 504. _See also_ Burgess _v._ Salmon, 97 U.S. 381, 383 (1878).
[204] Matthews _v._ Zane, 7 Wheat. 164, 211 (1822).
[205] Lapeyre _v._ United States, 17 Wall. 191, 198 (1873).
[206] Okanogan Indians _v._ United States, 279 U.S. 655 (1929).
[207] Wright _v._ United States, 302 U.S. 583 (1938).
[208] Missouri P.R. Co. _v._ Kansas, 248 U.S. 276 (1919).
[209] 20 Wall. 92, 112, 113 (1874).
[210] 12 Stat. 589 (1862).
[211] 54th Cong., 2d sess., S. Doc. 1335; Hinds' Precedents of the House of Representatives, IV: -- 3483 (1907).
[212] _See e.g._, Lend Lease Act of March 11, 1941 (55 Stat. 31); First War Powers Act of December 18, 1941 (55 Stat. 838); Emergency Price Control Act of January 30, 1942 (56 Stat. 23); Stabilization Act of October 2, 1942 (56 Stat. 765); War Labor Disputes Act of June 25, 1943 (57 Stat. 163).
[213] Reorganization Act of June 20, 1949 (63 Stat. 203).
[214] Reorganization Act of April 3, 1939 (53 Stat. 561).
[215] Hollingsworth _v._ Virginia, 3 Dall. 378 (1798).
[216] License Tax Cases, 5 Wall. 462, 471 (1867).
[217] Brushaber _v._ Union Pac. R.R., 240 U.S. 1 (1916).
[218] Ibid. 12.
[219] 253 U.S. 245 (1920).
[220] 268 U.S. 501 (1925).
[221] 307 U.S. 277 (1939).
[222] 11 Wall. 113 (1871).
[223] Graves _v._ O'Keefe, 306 U.S. 466 (1939).
[224] 304 U.S. 405, 414 (1938).
[225] Veazie Bank _v._ Fenno, 8 Wall. 533 (1869).
[226] United States _v._ Baltimore & O.R. Co., 17 Wall. 322 (1873).
[227] 157 U.S. 429 (1895).
[228] 4 Wheat. 316 (1819).
