The Constitution of the United States of America: Analysis and Interpretation - novelonlinefull.com
You’re read light novel The Constitution of the United States of America: Analysis and Interpretation Part 212 online at NovelOnlineFull.com. Please use the follow button to get notification about the latest chapter next time when you visit NovelOnlineFull.com. Use F11 button to read novel in full-screen(PC only). Drop by anytime you want to read free – fast – latest novel. It’s great if you could leave a comment, share your opinion about the new chapters, new novel with others on the internet. We’ll do our best to bring you the finest, latest novel everyday. Enjoy
[1060] State Tax Comrs. _v._ Jackson, 283 U.S. 527, 537 (1931).
[1061] Colgate _v._ Harvey, 296 U.S. 404, 422 (1935).
[1062] Darnell _v._ Indiana, 226 U.S. 390, 398 (1912); Farmers & M. Sav.
Bank _v._ Minnesota, 232 U.S. 516, 531 (1914).
[1063] Morf _v._ Bingaman, 298 U.S. 407, 413 (1936).
[1064] Baltic Min. Co. _v._ Ma.s.sachusetts, 231 U.S. 68, 88 (1913). _See also_ Cheney Bros. Co. _v._ Ma.s.sachusetts, 246 U.S. 147, 157 (1918).
[1065] Fire a.s.so. of Philadelphia _v._ New York, 119 U.S. 110, 119 (1886).
[1066] Hanover F. Ins. Co. _v._ Harding, 272 U.S. 494, 511 (1926).
[1067] Southern R. Co. _v._ Greene, 216 U.S. 400, 418 (1910).
[1068] Concordia F. Ins. Co. _v._ Illinois, 292 U.S. 535 (1934).
[1069] Lincoln Nat. Life Ins. Co. _v._ Read, 325 U.S. 673 (1945).
[1070] Wheeling Steel Corp. _v._ Glander, 337 U.S. 562, 571, 572 (1949).
[1071] Royster Guano Co. _v._ Virginia, 253 U.S. 412 (1920).
[1072] Shaffer _v._ Carter, 252 U.S. 37, 56, 57 (1920); Travis _v._ Yale & T. Mfg. Co., 252 U.S. 60, 75, 76 (1920).
[1073] Welch _v._ Henry, 305 U.S. 134 (1938).
[1074] Magoun _v._ Illinois Trust & Sav. Bank, 170 U.S. 283, 288, 300 (1898).
[1075] Billings _v._ Illinois, 188 U.S. 97 (1903).
[1076] Campbell _v._ California, 200 U.S. 87 (1906).
[1077] Salomon _v._ State Tax Commission, 278 U.S. 484 (1929).
[1078] Board of Education _v._ Illinois, 203 U.S. 553 (1906).
[1079] Maxwell _v._ Bugbee, 250 U.S. 525 (1919).
[1080] Continental Baking Co. _v._ Woodring, 286 U.S. 352 (1932).
[1081] Dixie Ohio Express Co. _v._ State Revenue Commission, 306 U.S.
72, 78 (1939).
[1082] Alward _v._ Johnson, 282 U.S. 509 (1931).
[1083] Bekins Van Lines _v._ Riley, 280 U.S. 80 (1929).
[1084] Morf _v._ Bingaman, 298 U.S. 407 (1936).
[1085] Clark _v._ Paul Gray, Inc., 306 U.S. 583 (1939).
[1086] Carley & Hamilton _v._ Snook, 281 U.S. 66 (1930).
[1087] Aero Mayflower Transit Co. _v._ Georgia Pub. Serv. Commission, 295 U.S. 285 (1935).
[1088] Breedlove _v._ Suttles, 302 U.S. 277 (1937).
[1089] Royster Guano Co. _v._ Virginia, 253 U.S. 412, 415 (1920).
[1090] Missouri _v._ Dockery, 191 U.S. 165 (1903).
[1091] Kentucky Union Co. _v._ Kentucky, 219 U.S. 140, 161 (1911).
[1092] Sunday Lake Iron Co. _v._ Wakefield Twp., 247 U.S. 350 (1918); Raymond _v._ Chicago Union Traction Co., 207 U.S. 20, 35, 37 (1907).
[1093] Coulter _v._ Louisville & N.R. Co., 196 U.S. 599 (1905). _See also_ Chicago, B. & Q.R. Co. _v._ Babc.o.c.k, 204 U.S. 585 (1907).
[1094] Charleston a.s.sn. _v._ Alderson, 324 U.S. 182 (1945). Nashville, C. & St. L. Ry. _v._ Browning, 310 U.S. 362 (1940).
[1095] Sioux City Bridge Co. _v._ Dakota County, 260 U.S. 441, 446 (1923).
[1096] Hillsborough _v._ Cromwell, 326 U.S. 620, 623 (1946).
[1097] St. Louis-San Francisco R. Co. _v._ Middlekamp, 256 U.S. 226, 230 (1921).
[1098] Memphis & C.R. Co. _v._ Pace, 282 U.S. 241 (1931).
[1099] Kansas City Southern R. Co. _v._ Road Improv. Dist., 256 U.S. 658 (1921); Thomas _v._ Kansas City Southern R. Co., 261 U.S. 481 (1923).
[1100] Road Improv. Dist. _v._ Missouri P.R. Co., 274 U.S. 188 (1927).
[1101] Branson _v._ Bush, 251 U.S. 182 (1919).
[1102] Columbus & G.R. Co. _v._ Miller, 283 U.S. 96 (1931).
[1103] Buck _v._ Bell, 274 U.S. 200, 208 (1927).
[1104] Cla.s.sifications under police regulations have been held valid in the following situations:
_Advertising:_ discrimination between billboard and newspaper advertising of cigarettes, Packer Corp. _v._ Utah, 285 U.S. 105 (1932); prohibition of advertising signs on motor vehicles, except when used in the usual business of the owner, and not used mainly for advertising, Fifth Ave. Coach Co. _v._ New York, 221 U.S. 467 (1911); prohibition of advertising on motor vehicles except notices or advertising of products of the owner, Railway Express Inc. _v._ New York, 336 U.S. 106 (1949); prohibition against sale of articles on which there is a representation of the flag for advertising purposes, except newspapers, periodicals and books; Halter _v._ Nebraska, 205 U.S. 34 (1907).
_Amus.e.m.e.nt:_ prohibition against keeping billiard halls for hire, except in case of hotels having twenty-five or more rooms for use of regular guests. Murphy _v._ California, 225 U.S. 623 (1912).
_Barber shops:_ a law forbidding Sunday labor except works of necessity or charity, and specifically forbidding the keeping open of barber shops. Pet.i.t _v._ Minnesota, 177 U.S. 164 (1900).
_Cattle:_ a cla.s.sification of sheep, as distinguished from cattle, in a regulation restricting the use of public lands for grazing. Bacon _v._ Walker, 204 U.S. 311 (1907). _See also_ Omaechevarria _v._ Idaho, 246 U.S. 343 (1918).
