The Constitution of the United States of America: Analysis and Interpretation - novelonlinefull.com
You’re read light novel The Constitution of the United States of America: Analysis and Interpretation Part 167 online at NovelOnlineFull.com. Please use the follow button to get notification about the latest chapter next time when you visit NovelOnlineFull.com. Use F11 button to read novel in full-screen(PC only). Drop by anytime you want to read free – fast – latest novel. It’s great if you could leave a comment, share your opinion about the new chapters, new novel with others on the internet. We’ll do our best to bring you the finest, latest novel everyday. Enjoy
[13] Minneapolis & St. L.R. Co. _v._ Bombolis, 241 U.S. 211 (1916), which involved The Federal Employers Liability Act of 1908. The ruling is followed in four other cases in the same volume. _See_ ibid. 241, 261, 485 and 494.
[14] Shields _v._ Thomas, 18 How. 253, 262 (1856).
[15] Parsons _v._ Bedford, 3 Pet. 433, 447 (1830); Barton _v._ Barbour, 104 U.S. 126, 133 (1881).
[16] Clark _v._ Wooster, 119 U.S. 322, 325 (1886); Pease _v._ Rathbun-Jones Eng. Co., 243 U.S. 273, 279 (1917).
[17] Parsons _v._ Bedford, above; Waring _v._ Clarke, 5 How. 441, 460 (1847). _See also_ The "Sarah," 8 Wheat. 390, 391 (1823), and cases there cited.
[18] Labor Board _v._ Jones & Laughlin, 301 U.S. 1, 48 (1937). _See also_ Interstate Commerce Commission _v._ Brimson, 154 U.S. 447, 488 (1894); Yakus _v._ United States, 321 U.S. 414, 447 (1944).
[19] McElrath _v._ United States, 102 U.S. 426, 440 (1880). _See also_ Galloway _v._ United States, 319 U.S. 372, 388 (1943).
[20] Guthrie Nat. Bank _v._ Guthrie, 173 U.S. 528, 534 (1899). _See also_ United States _v._ Realty Co., 163 U.S. 427, 439 (1896); Jefferson City Gaslight Co. _v._ Clark, 95 U.S. 644, 653 (1877).
[21] Luria _v._ United States, 231 U.S. 9, 27 (1913).
[22] Gee Wah Lee _v._ United States, 25 F. (2d) 107 (1928); certiorari denied, 277 U.S. 608 (1928).
[23] Filer & S. Co. _v._ Diamond Iron Works, 270 F. 489 (1921); certiorari denied, 256 U.S. 691 (1921).
[24] Crowell _v._ Benson, 285 U.S. 22, 45 (1932).
[25] In re Wood and Henderson, 210 U.S. 246 (1908).
[26] Auffmordt _v._ Hedden, 137 U.S. 310, 329 (1890).
[27] Walker _v._ New Mexico & S.P.R. Co., 165 U.S. 593, 598 (1897).
[28] Fidelity & D. Co. _v._ United States, 187 U.S. 315, 320 (1902).
[29] Jensen _v._ Continental Life Ins. Co., 28 F. (2d) 545 (1928), certiorari denied, 279 U.S. 842 (1929).
[30] Meeker _v._ Lehigh Valley R. Co., 236 U.S. 434, 439 (1915).
[31] Ex parte Peterson, 253 U.S. 300 (1920).
[32] United States _v._ Louisiana, 339 U.S. 699 (1950).
[33] Scott _v._ Neely, 140 U.S. 106, 109 (1891). _See also_ Bennett _v._ b.u.t.terworth, 11 How. 669 (1850); Hipp _v._ Babin, 19 How. 271, 278 (1857); Lewis _v._ c.o.c.ks, 23 Wall. 466, 470 (1874); Killian _v._ Ebbinghaus, 110 U.S. 568, 573 (1884); Buzard _v._ Houston, 119 U.S. 347, 351 (1886).
[34] Schoenthal _v._ Irving Trust Co., 287 U.S. 92, 94 (1932).
[35] American Mills Co. _v._ American Surety Co., 260 U.S. 360, 364 (1922). _See also_ Stamey _v._ United States, 37 F. (2d) 188 (1929).
[36] Thompson _v._ Central Ohio R. Co., 6 Wall. 134 (1868).
[37] Whitehead _v._ Shattuck, 138 U.S. 146 (1891); Buzard _v._ Houston, 119 U.S. 347 (1886); Greeley _v._ Lowe, 155 U.S. 58, 75 (1894).
[38] Clark _v._ Smith, 13 Pet. 195 (1839); Holland _v._ Challen, 110 U.S. 15 (1884); Reynolds _v._ Crawfordsville First Nat. Bank, 112 U.S.
405 (1884); Chapman _v._ Brewer, 114 U.S. 158 (1885); c.u.mmings _v._ Merchants Nat. Bank, 101 U.S. 153, 157 (1880); United States _v._ Landram, 118 U.S. 81 (1886); More _v._ Steinbach, 127 U.S. 70 (1888).
_Cf._ Re Simons, 247 U.S. 231 (1918).
[39] Ex parte Skinner & Eddy Corp., 265 U.S. 86, 96 (1924).
[40] Vicksburg & M.R. Co. _v._ Putnam, 118 U.S. 545, 553 (1886); United States _v._ Reading Railroad, 123 U.S. 113, 114 (1887).
[41] 118 U.S. 545; where are cited Carver _v._ Jackson ex dem. Astor et al., 4 Pet. 1, 80 (1830); Magniac _v._ Thompson, 7 Pet. 348, 390 (1833); Mitch.e.l.l _v._ Harmony, 13 How. 115, 131 (1852); Transportation Line _v._ Hope, 95 U.S. 297, 302 (1877).
[42] Games _v._ Dunn, 14 Pet. 322, 327 (1840).
[43] Sparf _v._ United States, 156 U.S. 51, 99-100 (1895); Pleasants _v._ Fant, 22 Wall. 116, 121 (1875); Randall _v._ Baltimore & Ohio R.R.
Co., 109 U.S. 478, 482 (1883); Meehan _v._ Valentine, 145 U.S. 611, 625 (1892); Coughran _v._ Bigelow, 164 U.S. 301 (1896).
[44] Treat Mfg. Co. _v._ Standard Steel & Iron Co., 157 U.S. 674 (1895); Randall _v._ Baltimore & Ohio R.R. Co., 109 U.S. 478, 482 (1883) and cases there cited.
[45] Capital Traction Co. _v._ Hof, 174 U.S. 1, 13 (1899).
[46] Arkansas Land & Cattle Co. _v._ Mann, 130 U.S. 69, 74 (1889).
[47] Dimick _v._ Schiedt, 293 U.S. 474, 476-478 (1935).
[48] 228 U.S. 364 (1913).
[49] _See_ Austin Wakeman Scott, Fundamentals of Procedure in Actions at Law (1922), 103 and articles there cited.
[50] Baltimore & C. Line _v._ Redman, 295 U.S. 654 (1935).
[51] Ibid. 661.
[52] Lyon _v._ Mutual Benefit a.s.sn., 305 U.S. 484 (1939).
[53] 28 U.S.C.A. -- 724.
[54] Galloway _v._ United States, 319 U.S. 372 (1943).
[55] Ibid. 397. As a matter of fact, the case being a claim against the United States need not have been tried by a jury except for the allowance of Congress.
[56] Henderson's Distilled Spirits, 14 Wall. 44, 53 (1872). _See also_ Rogers _v._ United States, 141 U.S. 548, 554 (1891); Parsons _v._ Armor, 3 Pet. 413 (1830); Campbell _v._ Boyreau, 21 How. 223 (1859).
[57] Baylis _v._ Travelers' Ins. Co., 113 U.S. 316, 321 (1885), holding it error for a judge, in absence of any waiver, to find the facts and render judgment thereon.
[58] Duignan _v._ United States, 274 U.S. 195, 198 (1927), holding jury trial waived by an appearance and partic.i.p.ation in the trial without demanding a jury.
[59] Hodges _v._ Easton, 106 U.S. 408, 412 (1883).
[60] Aetna Insurance Co. _v._ Kennedy, 301 U.S. 389 (1937).
[61] _See_ Justices of the Sup. Ct. _v._ United States ex rel. Murray, 9 Wall. 274 (1870); Chicago, B. & Q.R. Co. _v._ Chicago, 166 U.S. 226, 242 (1897).
