Public Lands and Agrarian Laws of the Roman Republic Part 3

_Table of Civic Colonies in Italy._

------------------+----------------+-------+------------------------------- COLONIES. | LOCATION. | B.C. | AUTHORITY.

------------------+----------------+-------+------------------------------- 1 Ostea. | Latium. | 418 | Livy, 1, 33; Dionys., 3, 44; | | | Polyb., 6, 29; Cic. de R.R., | | | 2, 18, 33.

2 Labici. | " | 418 | Livy, 4, 47, 7.

3 Antium. | " | 338 | " 8, 14.

4 Auxur. | " | 329 | " 8, 21; 27, 38; Vell. 1, 14.

5 Minturnae. | Campania. | 296 | Livy, 10, 21.

6 Sinuessa. | " | 296 | " 10, 21; 27, 38.

7 Sena Gallica. | Umbria. | 283 | " Epit., 11; Vell., 1, 14, 8.

8 Castrum Novum. | Picenum. | 283 | Livy, Epit., 11; Vell.,1,14,8.

9 Aesium. |Umbria. | 247 | Vell., 1, 14, 8.

10 Alsium. | Etruria. | 247 | " 1, 14, 8; L. Epit., 19; | | | L., 36, 3.

11 Fregena. | " | 245 | Livy, 36, 3.

12 Pyrgi. | " | 191 | " "

13 Puteoli. | Campania. | 194 | " 34, 45.

14 Volturnum. | " | 194 | Id.

15 Liturnum. | " | 194 | Id.

16 Salernum. | " | 194 | Id.

17 Buxentum. | Lucania. | 194 | Livy, 34, 45.

18 Sipontum. | Apulia. | 194 | Id.

19 Tempsa. | Bruttii. | 194 | Id.

20 Croton. | " | 194 | Id.

21 Potentia. | Picenum. | 184 | Livy, 39, 44.

22 Pisaurum. | Umbria. | 184 | " " "

23 Parma. | Gallia Cis. | 183 | " " 55.

24 Mutina. | Gallia Cis. | 183 | Livy, 39, 55.

25 Saturnia. | Etruria. | 183 | " " "

26 Graviscae. | " | 181 | " 40, 39.

27 Luna. | " | 180 | " 41, 13.

28 Auximum. | Picenum. | 157 | Vell., 1, 15, 3.

29 Fabrateria. | Latium. | 124 | " 1, 15, 4.

30 Minervia. | Bruttii. | 122 | " 1, 15, 4; Appian B.C., | | | 2, 23.

31 Neptunia. | Iapygia. | 122 | Id.

32 Dertona. | Liguria. | 100 | Vell., 1, 15, 5.

33 Eporedia. | Gallia Trans. | 100 | " " "

34 Narbo Martius. | " Narbo. | 118 | Mommsen. (sic.) ------------------+----------------+-------+-------------------------------

[Footnote 1: Bouchaud, M.A., _Dissertation sur les colonies romaines_, pp.

114-222, en Memoires de l'inst.i.tut Sciences, Morals et Politique, III.]

[Footnote 2: Muirhead's Article on _Roman Law_ in Ency. Brit.; Ihne, I, 235.]

[Footnote 3: Momm., I, 145.]

[Footnote 4: Momm., _loc. cit_.]

[Footnote 5: Brutus (App. B.C., II, 140) calls the colonists, [Greek: phylakas ton pepolemaekoton].]

[Footnote 6: Ihne, I, 236.]

[Footnote 7: Cicero, Ad Att., I,19: "Sentinam urbis exhaurire, et Italiae solitudinem frequentori posse arbitrabor."]

[Footnote 8: Momm., I, 145.]

[Footnote 9: Marquardt u. Momm., IV, 35-51; Momm., _History of Rome_, I, 108, 539; Madvigi Opuscula Academica, I, 208-305.]

[Footnote 10: Marquardt u. Momm., IV, 35-51; Ihne, vols. I-V; Momm., vols.

I-V; Madvigi Opus., _loc. cit_.]

CHAPTER II.

Sec. 5.--Lex Ca.s.sia.

Every year added to the difference between the patrician and plebeian, the rich and the poor; a difference which had now grown so great as to threaten seriously the very existence of the state. The most sagacious of all the plans which had been proposed to stop this evil, was that set forth by Spurius Ca.s.sius, a n.o.ble patrician now acting as consul for the third[l]

time. In the year 268, he submitted to the burgesses[2] a proposal to have the public land surveyed, that portion belonging to the populus set aside and the remainder divided among the plebeians or leased for the benefit[3]

of the public treasury.

He thus attempted to wrest from the senate the control of the public land and, with the aid of the Latini and the plebeians, to put an end to the system of occupation.[4] The lands which he proposed to divide were solely those which the state had acquired through conquest since the general a.s.signment by king Servius, and which it still retained.[5] This was the first measure by which it was proposed to disturb the possessors in their peaceful occupation of the state lands, and, according to Livy, such a measure had never been proposed from then to the time in which he was writing, under Augustus, without exciting the greatest disturbance.[6]

Ca.s.sius might well suppose that his personal distinction and the equity and wisdom of the measure would carry it through, even amidst the storm of opposition to which it was subjected. Like many other reformers equally well meaning, he was mistaken.

The citizens who occupied this land had grown rich by reason of its possessions. Some of them received it as an inheritance, and doubtless looked upon it as their property as much as the _Ager Roma.n.u.s_. These to a man opposed the bill. The patricians arose en ma.s.se. The rich plebeians, the aristocracy of wealth, took part with them. Even the commons were dissatisfied because Spurius Ca.s.sius proposed in accordance with federal rights and equity to bestow a portion of the land upon the Latini and Hernici, their confederates and allies.[7] The bill proposed by Ca.s.sius, together with such provisions as were necessary, became a law, according to Niebuhr,[8] because the tribunes had no power to bring forward a law of any kind before the plebeian tribes obtained a voice in the legislature by the enactment of the Publilian law in 472 B.C.; so that when they afterwards made use of the agrarian law to excite the public pa.s.sions it must have been one previously enacted but dishonestly set aside and, in Dionysius'

account, this is the form which the commotion occasioned by it takes.[9]

Though this is doubtless true, yet the law, by reason of the combined opposition, became a dead letter and the people who would have been most benefited by its enforcement joined with Ca.s.sius' enemies at the expiration of his term of office to condemn him to death. In this way does ignorance commonly reward its benefactors. This agitation aroused by Ca.s.sius, stirred the Roman Commonwealth, now more than twenty years old, to its very foundations, but it had no immediate effect upon the _ager publicus_. The rich patrician together with the few plebeians who had wealth enough to farm this land, still held undisputed possession. The poor plebeian still continued to shed his blood on the battle field to add to Roman territory, but no foot of it did he obtain. Wealth centralized. Pauperism increased.

[Footnote 1: Dionysius, VIII, 68; "[Greek: Oi de para touton taen upateian paralabontaes poplios Ouerginios kai Sporios Ka.s.sios, to triton tote apodeichtheis upotos, k. t. l.]"]

[Footnote 2: Dionysius, VIII, 69; Livy, II, 41, _seq_.]

[Footnote 3: Dionysius, VIII, 81.]

[Footnote 4: Dionysius, VIII, 69; Mommsen, I, 363.]

[Footnote 5: Niebuhr, II, 166.]

[Footnote 6: Livy, II, 41; "Tum primum lex agraria promulgata est nunquam deinde usque ad hanc memoriam sine maximus motibus rerum agitata."]

[Footnote 7: Livy, II, 41; Dionysius, VIII, 69.]

[Footnote 8: Niebuhr, II.]

[Footnote 9: Dionysius, VIII, 81: [Greek: "Ekklaesiai te sunegeis hypo ton tote daemarchon eginonto kai apaitaeseis taes hyposcheseos." See also VIII, 87, line 25 _et seq._].]